期刊文献+

阻燃涂料处理胶合木短柱四面受火后力学性能试验研究 被引量:7

Experimental research on the mechanical behavior of short glulam columns with different fire retardant coating exposed to four-side fire
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过4组14根胶合木短柱四面受火后力学性能的对比试验,研究不同截面尺寸、表面处理、受火时间后胶合木柱的剩余承载力、破坏形态和炭化速度的变化规律。研究表明,四面受火20~60min后,胶合木柱剩余承载力随受火时间增加而显著降低,下降幅度为21%~73%,且下降幅度随截面尺寸的增加而减小,截面尺寸为200×200时,下降幅度为28%~73%,截面尺寸为300×300时,下降幅度为2l%~51%。胶合木柱炭化速度随受火时间增加有所降低。提出的基于实测炭化速度剩余承载力改进计算方法的计算结果与试验结果吻合较好,可用于预测四面受火胶合木柱的剩余承载力。 The residual bearing capacity, failure mode and charring rare of 14 glulam columns in 4 series exposed to four-side fire were experimentally studied under different cross-sections, fire retardant coating and exposed time. It is found that the residual hearing capacity of exposed specimens decrease obviously while the exposed time increasing, the residual bearing capacity decreases by 21% to 73% while the exposed time increased from 20 minutes to 60 minutes. The residual bearing capacity for specimens with 200 x 200 cross-section decreased by 28% to 73% , while for 300 × 300 cross-section was 21% to 51%. The charring rate decreases with increasing exposed time. The modified calculated method for the residual bearing capacity of glulam columns based on testing charring rate agrees well with the test results, which can be used for calculating the residual bearing capacity of glulam columns.
作者 胡小锋 韩逸尘 Hu Xiaofeng;Han Yichen(School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China;Nanjing Jinling High School, Nanjing 210005, China)
出处 《建筑结构》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第10期68-72,共5页 Building Structure
基金 上海市青年科技启明星计划项目(17QB1403400) 上海市科委课题(17DZ1203702)
关键词 胶合木柱 四面受火 力学性能 炭化速度 阻燃涂料 glulam column exposure to four-side fire mechanical behavior charring rate fire retardant coating
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献27

  • 1王清文,李坚.木材阻燃剂FRW的阻燃机理[J].林业科学,2005,41(5):123-126. 被引量:29
  • 2顾宇,李欣.中国古建筑防火设计研究[J].浙江理工大学学报(自然科学版),2007,24(1):84-87. 被引量:6
  • 3Schaffer E L. Fire - resistive structural design [ C ]//Proceedings of the International Seminar on Wood Engineering. US Forest Products Laboratory., Madison, WI, 1992:47 -60.
  • 4Buchanan A H. Structural Design for Fire Safety [ M]. John Wiley & Sons, LTD. 2001.
  • 5Lennon T, Bullock M J and Enjily V. The Fire Resistance of MediLnn- rise Timber Frame Buildings [ C]//Proceedings, World Conference on Timber Engineering, Whistler, Canada, 2000.
  • 6Robert ft. White. Use of Coatings to Improve Fire Resistance of Wood [M]. American Society tbr Testing and Materials 1916 Race Street, Philadelphia, PA 19103. 1984:24 -39.
  • 7Zeeland I M V,Salinas J J,Mehaffey J R.Compressive strength of lumber at high temperatures[J].Fire and Materials,2005,29(2):71-90.
  • 8Konig J.Structural fire design according to Eurocode5—design rules and their background[J].Fire and Materials,2005,29(3):147-163.
  • 9American Forest&Paper Association.Calculating the fire resistance of exposed wood members[R].Washington,DC:American Wood Council,2003.
  • 10Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes.National building code of Canada.[S].Ottawa:National Research Council of Canada,2010.

共引文献34

同被引文献62

引证文献7

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部