期刊文献+

“鉴定双轨制”下的法官自由裁量权之界限 被引量:7

Discretion of Judge under “Dual Expert Opinion System” in China: A Case Study Based on Loss of Life Opportunities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在医患关系紧张、"医闹案件"频现的局势下,"鉴定双轨制"下所暴露出的鉴定结论采纳规则不明、出庭质询制度不完善等问题都让法官的判决步履维艰,尤其体现在诸如"生存机会丧失"等新型医疗权利纠纷案件中。基于此,需要通过鉴定标准的统一、鉴定人实名制的建立、鉴定人异议意见保留、鉴定人出庭质询和专家辅助人等制度的完善手段来给法官的自由裁量权提供合理的行使空间,防止权力的滥用或架空,从而促进司法公正,让人民群众切实感受到公平正义。 In the context of the relationship between doctors and patients getting tense and"medical disturbance"more frequent than before,problems such as unclear adoption of expert opinion under the"Dual Expert Opinion System"and the imperfect court inquiry system have made court judge stagnant,in particular in cases involving new medical rights such as"Loss of life opportunities".For this reason,it is necessary to seek consistent expert opinion,establish real-name system for experts,preserve dissenting opinions,complete court inquiry system and expert auxiliary system.Only in this way could court judge able to provide reasonable discretion free from abuse of power and reflect people's real wish.
作者 季若望
出处 《云南社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第3期128-135,187,共8页 Social Sciences in Yunnan
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献168

同被引文献112

引证文献7

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部