期刊文献+

以生理学试题为例探索基础医学综合测试的定量分析方法 被引量:4

A study on the quantitative analysis of integrative tests of basic medicine based on physiological tests
原文传递
导出
摘要 考试结束后的试卷分析是改善试题质量,掌握学生学习情况,反馈教学的重要手段。本文以空军军医大学2013年~2016年五年制学生基础医学综合测试中120道生理学试题为例,利用区分度、难易度、试题项目曲线对具体试题质量进行评价,尝试拟定整合医学课程综合测试试题量化指标,探讨试题定量分析方法,为改进教学提供依据。 The test paper analysis is an important means to improve the quality of test questions, understand students' learning progress and provide feedback on the teaching. This paper studied 120 physiological test questions from integrative tests of basic medicine from 2013 to 2016 for students of five-year undergraduate program in Air Force Medical Univevsity, and evaluated the quality of test questions by investigating discrimination, difficulty and characteristic curve of each test question. On this basis, we tried to formulate the quantitative indicator of test questions for Holistic Integrative Medicine curriculum and introduce a few methods of carrying out the quantitative analysis of test questions, providing reference assistance for improving teaching methods.
作者 刘侃 张帅 郑淑园 田甜 刘亚莉 Liu Kan;Zhang Shuai;Zheng Shuyuan;Tian Tian;Liu Yali(Department of Foreign Languages, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Air Force Medical University, Xi' an 710032, China;Department of Microbiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Air Force Medical Univeraity ,Xi ' an 710032, China;Department of Preventive Dentistry, School of Stomatology , Air Force Medical Univeraity , Xi ' an 710032, China;Department of Physiology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Air Force Medical University, Xi' an 710032, China)
出处 《中华医学教育杂志》 2018年第3期388-393,共6页 Chinese Journal of Medical Education
基金 第四军医大学教学研究课题资助项目(ZL201611)
关键词 基础医学综合测试 生理学 试题 定量分析 Integrative tests of basic medicine Physiology Test questions Quantitative analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献37

  • 1丁晓娟,陈灵芝,余莉,刘伯玉,俞海洋,王明丽.运用试卷分析加强医学微生物学题库建设的初探[J].山西医科大学学报(基础医学教育版),2009(6):643-646. 被引量:14
  • 2江西师大"现代教育和心理测量通用分析系统"研制组,漆书青,周骏,张青华.用信息函数法对标准参照测验作质量分析[J].心理与行为研究,2003,1(1):34-39. 被引量:20
  • 3梅人朗.改变中的医学教育、评价和研究[J].复旦教育论坛,2005,3(2):84-88. 被引量:4
  • 4Lord,F. M.Optimal number of choices per item: A comparison of four approaches[].Journal of Educational Measurement.1977
  • 5Tavakol M,Dennick R.Psychometric evaluation of a knowledge based examination using Rasch analysis:An illustrative guide:AMEE Guide No.72[J].Medical Teacher,2013,35(1):e838-e848.
  • 6Kaiser,H.F.An index of factorial simplicity[J].Psychometrika,1974,39(1):31-36.
  • 7Hambleton R K,Swaminathan H.Item Response Theory:Principles and Applications[M].Boston:Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing,1985:148-168.
  • 8Stefanie S.Sebok,King Luu,Don A.Klinger.Psychometric properties of the multiple mini-interview used for medical admissions:findings from generalizability and Rasch analyses[J].Advances in Health Sciences Education,2014,19(1):71-84.
  • 9Baker,Frank B.The Basics of Item Response Theory[M].2nd ed.College Park:ERIC Clearinghouse on Assessment and Evaluation,2001:109.
  • 10汪存友,余嘉元.CTT与IRT参数不变性比较的实证研究综述[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2008(2):93-98. 被引量:1

共引文献33

同被引文献25

引证文献4

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部