摘要
审判体系和审判能力智能化是当前我国司法改革的取向之一,智能辅助刑事裁判系统的建设和应用具有重要的现实意义。美国卢米斯案中智能辅助量刑引发的争议启示我们应当注意人工智能辅助刑事裁判的不确定性、可解释性风险。应当坚守法官的主体性和智能裁判系统的工具性,防止出现对于智能工具的过度依赖和锚定效应。确立司法智能化改革和智能辅助裁判系统应用的制度框架,制定智能辅助裁判工具设计与使用的伦理准则,加强人工智能法学复合型人才培养,着力实现司法公开和司法正义。
Judicial system and judiciary intelligence are one of the orientations of China's judicial reform. The construction and application of the Intelligent Auxiliary Criminal Judgment System(IACJS) has important practical significance. The controversy of the case of State v. Loomis, 881 N.W.2 d 749(Wis.2016) alerts us to the uncertainty and the interpretative risk of IACJS. In the design and application of it,we should stick to the subjectivity of judges and the instrumentalities of IACJS to prevent over-reliance and anchoring effects. We should also establish the institutional framework of IACJS, formulate ethical guidelines for the design and use of the intelligent tools, strengthen the cultivation of compound talents with artificial intelligence technology and legal knowledge, and strive to achieve judicial openness and judicial justice.
出处
《浙江社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期76-85,共10页
Zhejiang Social Sciences
基金
中国法学会2016年度部级法学研究课题"人工智能风险治理的法治化问题及我国的对策研究"[CLS(2016)C12]的阶段性成果
上海市欧美同学会研究中心对后续研究的资助
关键词
人工智能
司法大数据
智能辅助刑事裁判
不确定性风险
风险治理
artificial intelligence
intelligent court
judicial big data
the intelligent auxiliary criminal judgment system
uncertainty risks
risk regulation
