期刊文献+

单孔腹腔镜与多孔腹腔镜在腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术中疗效的比较 被引量:8

A Comparison of Single-port Laparoscopic Surgery with Multi-port Laparoscopic Surgery in the Laparoscopic Ovarian Cystectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比分析单孔腹腔镜和多孔腹腔镜在腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术中的临床应用效果。方法选取2013年1月-2014年6月所收治的80例腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术的患者作为研究对象,按随机数字表法分成单孔组与多孔组,前者予以单孔腹腔镜,后者予以多孔腹腔镜,对两组患者的临床应用效果加以观察与对比。结果单孔组患者的手术时间比多孔组患者长,住院时间短,VAS评分差异显著,存在统计学意义(P<0.05);单孔组患者的术中出血量与多孔组相比,差异没有显著性(P>0.05)。结论单孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术较多孔腹腔镜卵巢囊肿剔除术有优越性,可改善疼痛症状,住院时间短,值得在临床上推行与应用。 Objective To compare the clinical effect of single port laparoscopic surgery and multi-port laparoscopic surgery in the laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy. Methods 80 patients with Laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy in our hospital,from Jan. 2013 to Jun. 2014,were analyzed. Cases were divided into single port laparoscopic group and multi-port laparoscopic group,according to the random number table method. To observe and compare the clinical effect of the two groups of patients. Results The operation time of the patients in single port laparoscopic group was longer than that in the porous laparoscopic group,but the hospitalization time was shorter,the VAS score was significantly different,and there was statistical significance( P〈0. 05). There was no significant difference in the amount of intraoperative blood loss between the two groups( P〉0. 05). Conclusions In the case of ovarian cyst removal,single port laparoscopic surgery is superior to that of multi-port laparoscopic surgery,which can improve the symptoms of pain and shorten hospitalization time. Therefore,it is worthy of popularization and application in clinic.
作者 梅松原 石岩 韩秋丽 MEI Songyuan;SHI Yan;HAN Qiuli(Gynecology and Obstetrics Department The Harbin 242 Hospital, Harbin 150066, China)
出处 《航空航天医学杂志》 2018年第4期398-400,共3页 Journal of Aerospace medicine
关键词 卵巢囊肿剔除术 单孔腹腔镜手术 多孔腹腔镜手术 laparoscopic ovarian cystectomy single port laparoscopic surgery multi - port laparoscopic
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献102

  • 1朱江帆,胡海,马颖璋,徐曼珠,李峰,郁林海,肖怀文.经脐入路腹腔镜手术的初步临床报告[J].中国微创外科杂志,2008,8(1):75-77. 被引量:143
  • 2Kalloo AN,Singh VK,Jagannath SB,et al.Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy:a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity.Gastrointest Endosc,2004,60(1):114-117.
  • 3Rattner D,Kallo A.ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.Surg Endosc,2006,20(2):329-333.
  • 4Marescaux J,Dallemgne B,Perretta S,et al.Surgery without scars report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being.Arch Surg,2007,142(9):823-826.
  • 5Kala Z,Hanke I,Neumann C.A modified technique in laparoscopy-assisted appendectomy-a transumbilical approach through a single port.Rozhl Chir,1996,75(1):15-18.
  • 6Navarra G,Pozza E,Occhionorelli S,et al.One-wound laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Br J Surg,1997,84(5):695.
  • 7Podolsky ER,Curcillo II PG,Rottman SJ,et al.Single port access (SPA) surgery-initial experience of a novel minimal access approach applied across surgical specialties.Surg Endosc,2008,22(Suppl):S172.
  • 8Rane A,Rao P,Rao P.Single-port-access nephrectomy and other laparoscopic urologic procedures using a novel laparoscopic port (R-port).Urology,2008,72:260-263.
  • 9Zhu JF.Scarless endoscopic surgery:NOTES or TUES.Surg Endosc,2007,21:1898-1899.
  • 10Gill IS,Canes D,Aron M,et al.Single-port transumbilical (E-NOTES) donor nephrectomy.J Urol,2008,180:637-641.

共引文献389

同被引文献74

引证文献8

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部