摘要
文中利用对贵州省三贫困县432个农户的调查,基于英国国际发展部(DFID)提出的可持续生计分析框架,在量化研究农户生计资本的基础上,运用二值选择Logit模型实证分析了生态补偿政策户和无政策户的生计资本对生计策略选择的影响。研究结果表明:政策户的总体生计资本水平低于无政策户,其中政策户的自然资本高于无政策户,而人力资本、物质资本和社会资本低于无政策户。农户的生计资本对生计策略选择具有显著影响,对于退耕还林政策户和无政策户而言,自然资本和人力资本会显著影响其生计策略选择,而公益林政策户的生计策略选择主要受人力资本和物质资本影响。在生态补偿的机制设计中,更多的关注农户的生计问题,才能实现减贫和环境改善的双赢局面。
In this research,432 peasant households in three poverty-stricken counties in Guizhou Province were surveyed. Analysis was carried out on the influence of livelihood capital of peasant households included in eco-compensation policy and peasant households excluded by eco-compensation policy on their selections of livelihood strategies by means of Logit model on the basis of quantitative research on the peasant households＇ livelihood capital in line with Sustainable Livelihood Analysis Framework put forward by Department for International Development（ DFID）. The research results show as the follows： the overall livelihood capital of peasant households included in eco-compensation policy is less than that of peasant households excluded by eco-compensation policy,of which the natural capital of peasant households included in eco-compensation policy is more than that of peasant households excluded by eco-compensation policy,while the human capital,material capital and social capital of peasant households included in eco-compensation policy are less than that of peasant households excluded by eco-compensation policy. The livelihood capital of peasant households has a significant influence on their selection of livelihood strategies. For peasant households included in the policy of returning the grain plots to forestry,their natural capital and human capital have a significant influence on their selection of livelihood strategies. However,for peasant households included in the policy of public welfare forest,their selection of livelihood strategies is mainly affected by human capital and material capital. When designing the mechanism for eco-compensation,more attention should be paid to the livelihood of the peasant households. Only by doing so can we realize the win-win scenario of poverty reduction and environmental improvement.
作者
吴乐
靳乐山
WU Le;JIN Leshan(College of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University,China Eco -compensation Policy Research Center, Beijing 100193, China)
出处
《干旱区资源与环境》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2018年第8期1-7,共7页
Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment
基金
国家发改委西部司重点调研课题项目(编号：XBS16-A1)资助
关键词
生态补偿
减贫
生计资本
生计策略
eco - compensation
poverty reduction
livelihood capital
livelihood strategy
