期刊文献+

食管鳞癌组织PD-L1表达临床意义 被引量:7

Expression of PD-L1 and its clinical significance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的程序性凋亡受体配体1(programmed death ligand-1,PD-L1)在多种肿瘤组织中存在过表达,然而关于其与食管鳞癌的研究尚不多见,本研究通过观察其在食管鳞癌石蜡组织中的表达情况,探讨其临床意义。方法收集河北医科大学第四医院2011-01-01-2011-08-31行根治性手术切除且淋巴结清除≥12枚的90例食管鳞癌石蜡组织标本,采用免疫组化方法检测PD-L1阳性表达。分析PD-L1阳性表达与临床病理特征和预后的关系,并进行多因素分析。结果PD-L1阳性表达率为30.0%(27/90),<60岁组PD-L1阳性表达率为46.3%,高于≥60岁组16.3%,χ2=9.576,P=0.002;淋巴结转移组PD-L1阳性表达率为41.3%,高于淋巴结阴性组26.1%,χ2=5.726,P=0.017;Ⅰ期PD-L1阳性表达率为3.7%,Ⅱ期为29.6%,Ⅲ期为65.7%,组间差异有统计学意义,χ2=7.891,P=0.019。全组患者中位总生存时间(overall survival,OS)为49.7个月,中位无进展生存期(progression-free-surviva,PFS)为27.5个月。PD-L1阳性表达组1、3、5年OS为68.0%、36.0%和32.0%,PFS为57.7%、30.8%和30.8%;阴性表达组1、3、5年OS为89.3%、62.5%和53.6%,PFS为85.7%、53.6%和50.0%。二者差异有统计学意义,χ2值分别为5.579和5.565,均P=0.018。PD-L1阳性表达与患者性别、病变位置、病变长度、T分期、肿瘤分化程度及脉管瘤栓情况均无相关。多因素分析显示,术后化疗为影响患者术后OS的独立影响因素(P=0.015),而淋巴结转移为影响患者术后OS(P<0.001)及PFS(P=0.001)的独立危险因素。结论食管鳞癌患者PD-L1阳性表达与年龄呈负相关,淋巴结阳性及pTNM分期较晚者PD-L1阳性表达率高。PD-L1阳性表达者预后差,术后化疗为影响患者术后OS的独立危险因素,而淋巴结转移是影响食管鳞癌患者术后OS和PFS的独立危险因素。 OBJECTIVE The expression of PD-L1(programmed death ligand-1)is overexpressed in many tumor tissues.However,researches on PD-L1 are still rare in ESCC.The purpose of this study was to observe the expression of programmed death ligand-1 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma tissues,and to investigate their clinical significance.METHODS A total of 90 patients received radical esophagectomy at the fourth hospital of Hebei medical university between January 1 st,2011 to August 31 st,2011 and whose lymphadenectomy number was no less than 12 were involved in this study.Immunohistochemical method was used to detect the positive expression of PD-L1.SPSS 21.0 statistical software was used to analyze the relations between expression of PD-L1 and clinicopathologic features and prognosis in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and multivariate analysis was also conducted.RESULTS The positive expression of PD-L1 was 30.0%(27/90).The positive expression of PD-L1 in60 years old group was significantly higher than those in ≥ 60 years old group(46.3% versus 16.3%,χ^2=9.576,P=0.002).The positive expression of PD-L1 in with and without lymph node metastasis group was 41.3% and 26.1%,also had significant difference(χ^2=5.726,P=0.017).The positive expression rate of PD-L1 in stage Ⅰ was 3.7%.While in stage Ⅱ was 29.6% and 65.7% in stageⅢ.There were significantly differences between each group(χ^2=7.891,P=0.019).The median overall survival(OS)in the whole group was 49.7 months,and the median progression-free survival(PFS)was 27.5 months.The 1-,3-,5-year OS and PFS in PD-L1 positive expression group were 68.0%,36.0%,32.0% and 57.7%,30.8%,30.8% respectively,which was significantly lower than 89.3%,62.5%,53.6% and 85.7%,53.6%,50.0% in negative expression group(χ^2=5.579,P=0.018;χ^2=5.565,P=0.018).The positive expression of PD-L1 was not correlated with gender,location and length of the tumor,T stage,tumor differentiation and blood vessel invasion.Cox regression analysis showed that postoperative adjuvant therapy was an independent risk factor for postoperative OS(P=0.015),while lymph node metastasis was an independent risk factor for postoperative OS(P〈0.001)and PFS(P=0.001).CONCLUSIONS The positive expression rate of PD-L1 in patients with lymph node metastasis and advanced pTNM stage are relatively higher,and both of them are negatively correlated with age.Patients with PD-L1 positive expression have poor prognosis.Postoperative adjuvant therapy is an independent risk factor for postoperative OS,while lymph node metastasis is an independent risk factor for postoperative OS and PFS in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.
作者 关嵩 王军 刘月平 景绍武 曹峰 王祎 焦文鹏 武亚晶 程云杰 GUAN Song;WANG Jun;LIU Yue-ping;JING Shao-wu;CAO Feng;WANG Yi;JIAO Wen-peng;WU Ya-jing;CHENG Yun-jie(Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050011 , P. R. China)
出处 《中华肿瘤防治杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2018年第11期778-783,共6页 Chinese Journal of Cancer Prevention and Treatment
关键词 食管鳞癌 程序性凋亡受体配体1 临床病理特征 预后 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma PD-L1 clinicopathological characteristics prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献11

  • 1Carter L,Fouser L A,Jussif J,et al.PD-1:PD-L inhibitory pathway affects both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells and is overcome by IL-2[J].Eur J Immunol,2002,32(3):634-643.
  • 2Latchman Y,Wood C R,Chernova T,et al.PD-L2 is a second ligand for PD-1 and inhibits T cell activation[J].Nat Immunol,2001,2(3):261-268.
  • 3Dong H,Zhu G,Tamada K,et al.B7-H1,a third member of the B7 family,co-stimulates T-cell proliferation and interleukin-10 secretion[J].Nat Med,1999,5(12):1365-1369.
  • 4Al-Shibli K,Al-Saad S,Donnem T,et al.The prognostic value of intraepithelial and stromal innate immune system cells in non-small cell lung carcinoma[J].Histopathology,2009,55(3):301-312.
  • 5Haspot F,Fehr T,Gibbons C,et al.Peripheral deletional tolerance of alloreactive CD8 but not CD4 T cells is dependent on the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway[J].Blood,2008,112(5):2149-2155.
  • 6Konishi J,Yamazaki K,Azuma M,et al.B7-H1 expression on non-small cell lung cancer cells and its relationship with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and their PD-1 expression[J].Clin Cancer Res,2004,10(15):5094-5100.
  • 7Wu K,Kryczek I,Chen L,et al.Kupffer cell suppression of CD8+ T cells in human hepatocellular carcinoma is mediated by B7-H1/programmed death-1 interactions[J].Cancer Res,2009,69(20):8067-8075.
  • 8张路,梁永杰,任涛,朱辉,徐志龙,戴亚蕾.CD4^+CD25^(high) Tr细胞在非小细胞肺癌中的表达及意义[J].实用医学杂志,2009,25(13):2060-2062. 被引量:7
  • 9王志敏,杜云翔,山顺林,单鹄声,闻旭阳,林浩,潘恩春.2009-2011年淮安市食管癌流行病学与治疗现状分析[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2013,20(5):334-337. 被引量:29
  • 10Song Y,Li L,Ou Y,崔淼,许春伟,张博.食管鳞状细胞癌基因组改变的确认[J].临床与实验病理学杂志,2014,30(11):1325-1325. 被引量:132

共引文献58

同被引文献39

引证文献7

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部