期刊文献+

瘤周围刺对4T1小鼠乳腺癌移植瘤作用研究 被引量:7

A preliminary study on the effect of surrounded needling on the 4T1 transplanted tumor in mice with breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:初步观察毫针、火针两种针具的瘤周围刺对荷乳腺癌小鼠肿瘤生长状态、机体免疫功能、预后情况的影响。方法:将对数增长期的4T1乳腺癌细胞株接种于小鼠前肢腋窝后方,建立BALB/c小鼠4T1乳腺癌移植瘤模型,随机分为模型组(18只,不干预)、毫针组(18只,瘤周围刺,留针20min)、火针组(18只,瘤周围刺),同时将正常饲养的小鼠作为空白组(9只)。以7d为1个治疗周期,每个周期的第1、4天干预,每个治疗周期结束后分别取材(肿瘤、胸腺、脾脏、血液),测量并计算对小鼠抑瘤率、胸腺指数、脾脏指数、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞绝对值比值(NLR)、血小板与淋巴细胞绝对值比值(PLR),共取材3次。结果:抑瘤率方面,火针组各时间点分别是6.043%,26.421%,51.132%,高于毫针组的1.999%,15.367%,45.929%。小鼠免疫方面,火针组各时间点胸腺指数分别是(3.38±0.41),(3.58±0.19),(3.23±0.24),较毫针组同期更加稳定(4.17±0.46),(2.97±0.43),(3.00±0.64)。火针组各时间点脾脏指数分别是(4.76±0.58),(5.78±0.24),(5.29±0.30),较毫针组同期更加稳定(5.10±0.47),(5.69±0.27),(5.11±0.14)。预后方面火针组各时间点PLR、NLR与毫针组同期数据无统计学意义。结论:瘤周围刺对4T1小鼠乳腺癌移植瘤增长具有明显抑制作用,火针优于毫针,且随干预时间延长抑瘤效果越明显,但其预后不如毫针围刺效果佳。 Objective:To preliminarily observe the effects of surrounded acupuncture with filiform needles and fire needles on the tumor growth status,immune function and the prognosis of mice with breast cancer.Methods:Inject the 4 T1 breast cancer cell strain under the skin of the forelimb armpit of the mice.Upon successful model establishment,the mice was randomly divided into 3 groups,which was model group(18,without any intervention),filiform needling group(18,surrounded acupuncture with filiform for 20 minutes)and the fire needling group(18,surrounded acupuncture with fire needles).Meanwhile,the general feeding mice were assigned as the normal group(9).The treatment circle lasted for 7 days,filiform intervention were implemented on the 1 st and 4 th day of the treatment circle.Observe the inhibition rate,measure spleen index and thymus index,detect the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio(NLR)and platelet-lymphocyte ratio(PLR)at each end of the treatment circle,3 times in total.Results:In terms of inhibition ratio of tumor volume fire needling group was 6.043%,26.421%,51.132% after each treatment period,exceeding the filiform needling group(1.999%,15.367%,45.929% respectively).In terms of the immunization:thymus index for fire needling group(3.38±0.41,3.58±0.19,3.23±0.24,respectively)was more stable than the filiform needling group(4.17±0.46,2.97±0.43,3.00±0.64).So as spleen index(fire needling group4.76±0.58,5.78±0.24,5.29±0.30,filiform needling group(5.10±0.47,5.69±0.27,5.11±0.14).In terms of prognosis:there was no statistical significance between groups in NLR(P〉0.05),but fire needling group shows statistical significance in PLR(P〈0.05).Conclusion:Surrounded acupuncture can inhibit the growth of the breast cancer on 4 T1 transplanted tumor mice.The effect of fire needling surrounded acupuncture is more significant than the filiform one.The better effects are shown as the treatment circle is prolonged,but the prognosis is basically the same bwtween two intervention group.
作者 李洪峥 姜欣 刘苗苗 钱旭 黄金昶 Li Hongzheng;Jiang Xin;Liu Miaomiao(School of Acupuncture Moxibustron and Tuina, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029)
出处 《陕西中医》 2018年第6期683-686,共4页 Shaanxi Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
基金 国家级大学生创新创业课题(201610026034)
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 针刺疗法 动物实验 小鼠 Breast neoplasms Acupuncture therapy Animal experimentation Mice
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献58

  • 1韩恩善,张雪,李国富.乳腺癌雌孕激素受体检测及临床病理分析[J].宁夏医学杂志,1997,19(2):68-69. 被引量:2
  • 2全国肿瘤登记中心.中国肿瘤登记工作指导手册[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版社,2004.48-50.
  • 3赫捷,赵平,陈万青.2012年中国肿瘤登记年报[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2012.56-59.
  • 4Nakopoulou L, I<azaris AC, Panayotopoulou EG, etal. The favourable prognostic value of oestrogen receptorbeta immunohistochemical expression in breast cancer[J] . J Clin Pathol, 2004, 57 (5) : 523-528.
  • 5Kurebayashi J. Current clinical trials of endocrine therapyfor breast cancer [ J] . Breast Cancer, 2007 , 14 (2):200-214.
  • 6Curado MPEB,Shin HR,Storm H,et al. Cancer Inci- dence in Five Continents,Vol. IX [M] . Lyon: IARC Sci- entific Publication,2008. 1-837.
  • 7Felay L, Burkhard C,Whe|an S,et al. Cheek and Conver- sion Programs for Cancer Registries. IARC Technical Re- port No.42[M]. Lyon : IARC, 2005.
  • 8Bray F,Parkin DM. Evaluation of data quality in the can- cer registry:principles and methods. Part I :comparabili- ty, validity and timeliness [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2009,45 (5).. 747-755.
  • 9Parkin DM,Chen VW,Ferlay J,et al. Comparability and Quality Control in Cancer Registration. |ARC Technical Report No.19[M]. Lyon:|ARC, 1994-.
  • 10Felay J. The IARCcrgTools program[EB/OL], http://www.i- acr.com.fr/iarccrgtoo|s.htm.

共引文献3616

同被引文献93

引证文献7

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部