期刊文献+

价值共毁研究的起源、现状与展望 被引量:23

Value Co-destruction Research: Origin, Present and Prospect
原文传递
导出
摘要 价值共创是营销领域的研究热点之一,作为价值共创对立面的价值共毁则少有学者关注。价值共毁是指在价值形成的互动过程中,由于参与者低效率地利用对方或自己的资源而造成至少一方福利减少的情形。随着价值共毁研究的理论和实践意义逐渐被认识,相关文献开始不断涌现。为了更好地推动价值共毁研究的发展,有必要对相关文献进行回顾。本文梳理了价值共毁研究的起源与发展,归纳总结了价值共毁的定义、分类、原因及流程等,并对未来的研究方向进行了展望。本文的贡献在于构建了一个综合性的价值共毁流程框架,利用科学变革理论对该领域的发展过程进行了阶段划分,并预测了未来的研究可能呈现的特征等。 Value co-destruction refers to the fact that at least one party's welfare decreases due to resource misuse in the process of value formation, which means that not only positive output but also negative or less-than-expected output will be co-produced during the interaction between actors. Therefore, it is necessary to carry out systematic research on this phenomenon of value co-destruction, which will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the interaction process of the value formation, and can be regarded as an important complement to the value co-creation research; from the perspective of practice, to explore the reasons and the process of value co-destruction will contribute to the prevention, identification, analysis and save of the value co-destruction of various forms, and be conducive to achieve value co-creation by pertinently motivating participants. The study of value co-destruction originates from the study of value co-creation because some scholars have discovered the phenomenon of value co-destruction while studying the value co-creation. But they have not paid much attention to this phenomenon. It is not until 2010 that some scholars formally put forward the concept and the definition of value co-destruction, which indicates the formal birth of this research field. Subsequently, a number of related studies emerge. The topics concerned include empirically testing of value co-destruction, discussing the definition and the classification of value co-destruction, and identifying the causes and the process of value co-destruction. In general, the value co-destruction study is in its infancy and thus research is mainly conceptual in nature. There are still some disputes about the definition of value co-destruction. Some scholars believe that the co- destruction only means negative output, but some others believe that it should also mean neutral and less-than-expected output. The concepts related to value co-destruction include value destruction, value diminution, and so on. The value destruction means that the welfare reduction only occurs on the person who is informed. In other words, it means that only one party's value creation process is negatively affected. The meaning of value diminution is more extensive than value co-destruction, and it refers to a suboptimal output below the most ideal situation. We can classify the value co-destruction from multiple perspectives, such as the structure of participants, the output level caused by co-destruction, and the time sequence in interaction process. The causes of the value co-destruction are diverse, and different kinds of literature hold different views. In general, these causes can be summarized as lack of trust, unequal status, lack of resources and inadequate communication/coordination or incongruent practice elements, misuse of resources, unequal value perception and so on. The logical relationship between these causes constitutes the flow chart of the value co-destruction. There are many research opportunities in the field of value co-destruction, and the related research in the future can be carried out from the following aspects. Firstly, strengthening the empirical study on the value co-destruction, especially in Chinese context; secondly, studying the problem of value co- destruction from a more general perspective; thirdly, carrying out the exploratory study on the value co- destruction involving three or more participants; fourthly, continuing to study the result of value co- destruction because the meaning of welfare reduction is still not clear; fifthly, studying how to overcome the main causes of value co-destruction. The contributions of this paper are to build a comprehensive theoretical framework of value co-destruction process, and to use the science revolution theory to divide the development process of this field into three stages and to predict the possible characteristics of future research.
作者 陈伟 吴宗法 徐菊 Chen Wei;Wu Zongfa;Xu Ju(School of Economics &Management, Tongji University, Shanghai 201804, China;Zhejiang Yuexiu University of Foreign Languages, Shaoxing 312000, China)
出处 《外国经济与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第6期44-58,共15页 Foreign Economics & Management
关键词 价值共毁 价值共创 互动 value co-destruction value co-creation interaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献93

  • 1金立印.虚拟品牌社群的价值维度对成员社群意识、忠诚度及行为倾向的影响[J].管理科学,2007,20(2):36-45. 被引量:159
  • 2Akaka MA, Vargo S L, Lusch R F. The complexity of context: A service ecosystems approach for international marketing[J]. Journal of International Marketing, 2013, 21 (4) : 1-20.
  • 3Akaka M A, Vargo S L. Technology as an operant resource in service ( eco ) systems[J]. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 2014, 12 (3) : 367 384.
  • 4Akaka M A, Vargo S L. Extending the context of service: From encounters to ecosystems[J]. Journal of Services Marketing, 2015, 29 (6-7) : 453-462.
  • 5Chandler J D, Vargo S L. Contextualization and value-in-context: How context frames exchange[J]. Marketing Theory, 2011, 11 (1) : 35-49.
  • 6Edvardsson B, Tronvoll B, Gruber T. Expanding understanding of service exchange and value co-creation: A social construction approach[J]. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2011, 39 ( 2 ) : 327-339.
  • 7FitzPatrick M, Varey R J, Gr6nroos C, et al. Relationality in the service logic of value creation[J]. Journal of Services Marketing, 2015, 29 (6-7) : 463-471.
  • 8Frow P, McColl-Kennedy J R, Hilton T, et al. Value propositions-a service ecosystems perspective[J]. Marketing Theory, 2014, 14 (3) : 327-351.
  • 9Gr6nroos C. Adopting a service logic for marketing[J]. Marketing Theory, 2006, 6 ( 3 ) : 317-333. [20]Gr6nroos C. Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates?[J]. European Business Review, 2008, 20 (4) : 298-314.
  • 10Gr/Snroos C. Service logic revisited: Who creates value? And who co-creates?[K]. European Business Review, 2008, 20 (4) : 298-314.

共引文献371

同被引文献178

引证文献23

二级引证文献186

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部