期刊文献+

Ryan指数与反流症状指数量表、反流体征量表在咽喉反流性疾病诊断中的相关性分析 被引量:18

Correlation analysis between Ryan index and reflux symptom index and reflux finding score,in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨Ryan指数与反流症状指数量表(RSI)、反流体征量表(RFS)在咽喉反流性疾病诊断中的相关性。方法回顾性分析以咽喉部不适症状就诊,病程1个月以上的行咽部pH检测的230例患者临床资料。所有患者均同时行电子喉镜检测,并行RSI、RFS评估。结果 Ryan指数阳性率为15.2%(35/230)。RSI、RFS、RSI或RFS及RSI且RFS阳性率分别为46.5%、28.7%、60.9%、13.9%。Ryan指数阳性组患者RFS评分高于Ryan指数阴性组患者,RSI评分与Ryan指数阴性组患者差异无统计学意义。RFS阳性,RSI或RFS,RSI且RFS阳性组Ryan指数阳性率高于RFS阴性,RSI或RFS,RSI且RFS阴性组。Ryan指数阳性与RSI、RFS、RSI或RFS及RSI且RFS阳性的一致性检验的kappa值分别为-0.06,0.394,0.116和0.172。以pH监测作为金标准时,RSI、RFS、RSI或RFS及RSI且RFS的敏感性分别为37.1%,74.3%,82.9%,28.6%;特异性分别为51.8%,79.5%,43.1%,88.2%;阳性预测值分别为12.1%,39.4%,20.7%,30.3%;阴性预测值分别为82.1%,94.5%,93.3%,87.3%。RSI与直立位及平卧位Ryan指数的相关系数分别为-0.056和-0.083;RFS与直立位及平卧位Ryan指数的相关系数分别为0.425和0.166。结论咽部pH检测是直接反映咽喉部反流的客观、无创的检测方法。RFS与Ryan指数有一定的正相关性,但量表与Ryan指数一致性差。尚需进一步研究更准确的、反映咽喉反流的量表及pH诊断指数。 Objective To explore the correlation between Ryan index and reflux symptom index(RSI) and reflux finding score(RFS),in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux diseases.Methods In a retrospective study,the clinical data of 230 patients presenting at the hospital with suffering from laryngopharyngeal discomfort for more than a month,in our hospital from February 2016 to November 2016,were analyzed.All patients were received underwent electronic laryngoscopy,assessment of RSI and RFS,and pharyngeal pH monitoring.Results There were 35 patients(15.2%) whose with positive Ryan index were scorepositive(15.2%).The positive rate of RSI,RFS,RSI or RFS,and RSI and RFS were positive in 46.5%,28.7%,60.9%,and 13.9% of the patients,respectively.The RFS score in the Ryan index positive group was higher than that in the Ryan index negative group,while the RSI score in the Ryan index positive group was not statistically different from that in the Ryan index negative group.The Ryan index positive rates in the RFS,RSI or RFS,and RSI and RFS positive groups were higher than that in the RFS,RSI or RFS,and RSI and RFS negative groups.The kappa values between the Ryan index group and RSI,RFS,RSI or RFS,and RSI and RFS groups were-0.06,0.394,0.116,and 0.172,respectively.When pH monitoring was regarded as the gold standard,the sensitivity of RSI,RFS,RSI or RFS,and RSI and RFS were 37.1%,74.3%,82.9%,and 28.6%,respectively;the specificity was were 51.8%,79.5%,43.1%,and 88.2%,respectively;the positive predictive values was were 12.1%,39.4%,20.7%,and 30.3%,respectively;and the negative predictive values was were 82.1%,94.5%,93.3%,and 87.3%,respectively.The correlation coefficients between RSI and upright and supine Ryan scores were-0.056 and-0.083,respectively;the correlation coefficients between RFS and upright and supine Ryan scores were 0.425 and 0.166,respectively.Conclusion Pharyngeal pH monitoring is an objective and non-invasive method which can reflect laryngopharyngeal reflux directly.There is a positive correlation between the RFS and the Ryan index,however,the consistency of correlation between RFS/RSI and Ryan index were is poor.Further studies research areis needed to get moredevelop an accurate scale and pH diagnostic index for the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease.
作者 王刚 吴玮 王磊 刘红丹 徐小杭 徐冰心 丁瑞英 周莹 韩浩伦 龚敬 李保卫 孙喆喆 WANG Gang;WU Wei;WANG Lei;LIU Hongdan;XU Xiaohang;XU Bingxin;DING Ruiying;ZHOU Ying;HAN Haolun;GONG Jing;LI Baowei;SUN Zhezhe(Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chinese PLA 306th Hospital, Beijing 100101, China;State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Environmental Sense Organ Stress and Health, Beijing 100101, China;Molecular Biology Research Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore 21218, USA)
出处 《山东大学耳鼻喉眼学报》 CAS 2018年第4期48-52,共5页 Journal of Otolaryngology and Ophthalmology of Shandong University
关键词 咽喉反流性疾病 咽部pH检测 Ryan指数 反流症状指数量表 反流体征评分量表 Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease Pharyngeal pH monitoring Ryan index Reflux symptom index Reflux finding score
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献144

  • 1王晓晔,韩德民,叶京英.咽喉反流[J].国际耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志,2006,30(5):281-285. 被引量:46
  • 2汪忠镐,陈秀,韩冰,刘建军,李震,闫军红,巩燕,吴继敏,李茂源,隋波.胃食管反流病引起“顽固性哮喘”以致气胸一例报告[J].临床误诊误治,2006,19(11):8-9. 被引量:18
  • 3汪忠镐,刘建军,吴继敏,王利营,陈秀,巩燕,白晶,董元元,胡亚辉,孙潮涌.射频治疗胃食管反流病70例报告[J].临床外科杂志,2007,15(6):404-406. 被引量:19
  • 4汪忠镐,刘建军,陈秀,吴继敏,王利营,巩燕,白晶,董元元,胡亚辉,来运纲.胃食管喉气管综合征(GELTS)的发现与命名——Stretta射频治疗胃食管反流病200例[J].临床误诊误治,2007,20(5):1-4. 被引量:61
  • 5Adams J, Heintz P, Gross N, et al. Acid/pepsin promotion of carcinogenesis in the hamster cheek pouch. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2000, 126 : 405-409.
  • 6Koufman JA. The otolaryngologic manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) : a clinical investigalion of 225 patients using ambulatory 24-hour pH monitoring and an experimental investigation of the role of acid and pepsin in the development of laryngeal injury. Laryngoscope, 1991 101 (4 Pt 2 Suppl 53 ) : 1-78.
  • 7Koufman JA, Burke AJ. The etiology and pathogenesis of laryngeal carcinoma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am, 1997, 30: 1-19.
  • 8Payne R J, Kost KM, Frenkiel S, et al. Laryngeal inflammation assessed using the reflux finding score in obstructive sleep apnea. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2006, 134: 836-842.
  • 9Koufman JA. Laryngopharyngeal reflux 2002: a new paradigm of airway disease. Ear Nose Throat J, 2002, 81 (9 Suppl 2) : 2-6.
  • 10Ulualp SO, Toohill R J, Hoffmann R, et al. Pharyngeal pH monitoring in patients with posterior laryngitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1999, 120: 672-677.

共引文献296

同被引文献140

引证文献18

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部