期刊文献+

缺血性脑卒中幸存者的相对生存率及其影响因素分析 被引量:8

Relative Survival of Patients with Ischemic Stroke
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的估算缺血性脑卒中幸存者的相对生存率并探索相对生存率的影响因素。方法采用寿命表法和EdererⅡ法估算首发缺血性脑卒中幸存者的相对生存率;采用泊松误差结构模型,探索缺血性脑卒中幸存者相对生存率的影响因素。结果首发缺血性脑卒中幸存者1年、3年、5年、7年相对生存率分别为99%、98%、98%、99%;相比于<53岁组,53~62岁组超额死亡风险增加[相对超额死亡风险(RER)=26.975,95%CI:1.668~410.90;P=0.020 1];相比于mRS评分<3分的患者,mRS评分≥3分超额死亡风险增加(RER=14.700,95%CI:1.05~206.45;P=0.047 3);相比于体质量正常者,体质量过轻者超额死亡风险增加(RER=10.082,95%CI:2.076~48.958,P=0.004 2)。结论对于缺血性脑卒中幸存者,生存率略低于可比的一般人群,长期生存状况较好。其中,首发年龄介于53~62岁、出院后3月mRS≥3分、体质量过轻的患者超额死亡风险相对较高,建议给予这类患者更多关注。 Objective To estimate the relative survival ratio of patients with ischemic stroke and its risk factors.Methods Lifetable and EdererⅡ methods were used to estimate the relative survival ratio of patients with ischemic stroke.The Poission error structure model was adopted to determine the risk factors associated with survival.Results The patients had 99%,98%,98%and 99%relative survival ratio 1 year,3 years,5 years and 7 years after stroke,respectively.The relative excess risk of death increased with age [53-62 yr.vs.53 yr.,relative excess risk(RER=26.975,95%CI:1.668-410.90,P=0.020 1],higher mRS scores(≥3 vs.3 points,RER=14.700,95%CI:1.05-206.45,P=0.047 3),and under body mass(vs.normal body mass,RER=10.082,95%CI:2.076-48.958,P=0.004 2).Conclusion Ischemic stroke patients have a good prognosis,with slightly lower survival rates than the matched general populations.Those who are older,under body mass,and have a higher mRS score have lower survival rates.
作者 李宓儿 王菊 杜旭东 朱萍 张露 周沐科 朱彩蓉 LI Mi-er;WANG Ju;DU Xu-dong;ZHU Ping;ZHANG Lu;ZHOU Mu-ke;ZHU Cai-rong(Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics,West China School of Public Health,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China;Department of Neurology,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu 610041,China)
出处 《四川大学学报(医学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第4期594-598,共5页 Journal of Sichuan University(Medical Sciences)
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.81673273和No.30600511)资助
关键词 相对生存 超额死亡风险 缺血性脑卒中 Relative survival Relative excess risk Ischemic stroke
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献77

  • 1宋新杰,王伊龙,赵性泉.脑卒中患者生存质量的评定及研究现况[J].中国康复理论与实践,2005,11(6):447-450. 被引量:20
  • 2陈英,王声涌,喻侠华,李安荣,洪城,池桂波,曾立忠.WHOQOL-100中文版量表评定急性脑卒中患者生活质量分析[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2007,29(8):546-548. 被引量:37
  • 3van der Putten JJM, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the Functional Independence Measure[J]. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1999; 6
  • 4Wallace D, Duncan PW, Lai SM. Comparison of responsiveness of the Barthel Index and the motor component of the Functional Independence Measure in stroke: the impact of using different methods for measuring responsiveness[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 2002; 55(9):
  • 5Wade DT, Collin C. The Barthel ADL index: a standard measure of disability[J]? International Disability Studies, 1988; 10(2): 64-67
  • 6Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Ford G. Evaluation of measures used to assess quality of life after stroke[J]. Stroke, 2000; 31(8): 2 004-2 010
  • 7Kay R, Wong KS, Perez G, Woo J. Dichotomizing stroke outcomes based on self-reported dependency[J]. Neurology, 1997; 49(6): 1 694-1 696
  • 8Collin C, Wade DT, Davis S, Horne V. The Barthel ADL index: a reliability study[J]. International Disability Studies, 1988; 10(2): 61-63
  • 9Wolfe CD, Taub NA, Woodrow EJ, Burney PG. Assessment of scales of disability and handicap for stroke patients[J]. Stroke, 1991; 22(10): 1 242-1 244
  • 10D'Olhaberriague, Litvan I, Mitsias P, Mansbach HH. A reappraisal of reliability and validity studies in stroke[J]. Stroke, 1996; 27(12): 2 331-2 332

共引文献360

同被引文献81

引证文献8

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部