期刊文献+

暧昧环境下的不对称信息更新与资产定价研究 被引量:5

Studies on asymmetric information updating and asset pricing in ambiguous economy
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文假定金融市场上存在两种风险资产,其中一种风险资产存在信息更新,而另外一种资产不存在信息更新,简单投资者对两类风险资产之间的相关系数存在暧昧性(ambiguity),本文研究了这种不对称的信息更新对两类风险资产的需求函数和市场一般均衡的影响,研究发现信息更新在长期内可以降低参数暧昧性,提高定价效率;在短期内可以驱动相应的风险资产产生额外的需求,消除对应资产的有限参与现象,但是这种由信息驱动的有限参与现象的消除并不能带来定价效率的提高.同时不对称的信息更新可能导致没有信息更新的资产从共同参与均衡过渡到有限参与均衡,因此政府试图通过信息披露提高市场透明度、改善定价效率的目的只能在长期内才会实现,在短期内信息披露可能会使得资产的定价效率产生恶化. In this paper, we consider an economy with three financial assets, one risk-free asset and two risky assets (denoted by asset 1 and asset 2), and with two types of traders, naive traders and sophisticated traders. The naive traders are supposed to be uncertain about the correlation coefficient between the two risky assets. After the market begin, a signal about the future value of asset 1 is released. We investigated the impact of this asymmetric information updating on the demand function and the general equilibrium. We find that information disclosure will help the naive traders to decrease the ambiguity and thus increase the pricing efficiency in the long run, but not in the short term. Besides, asymmetric information updating may lead the equilibrium of the asset without news disclosure to transfer from a co-participation one to a limited participation one. So the intent to improve the transparency of market and the pricing efficiency by increased disclosure requirements may be accomplished only in the long run.
作者 郭荣怡 张顺明 纪晨 GUO Rongyi;ZHANG Shunming;JI Chen(School of Finance,Renmin University of China,Beijing 100872,China)
出处 《系统工程理论与实践》 EI CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2018年第7期1633-1655,共23页 Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice
基金 国家自然科学基金(71573220,71773123)~~
关键词 暧昧厌恶 信息更新 资产定价 ambiguity averse information updating asset pricing
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献50

  • 1刘萍,凌晓东.金融资产组合优化管理系统[J].系统工程理论与实践,1994,14(6):48-53. 被引量:1
  • 2Lars Peter Hansen,Thomas J. Sargent.Robustness and ambiguity in continuous time[J]. Journal of Economic Theory . 2011 (3)
  • 3Gurdip Bakshi,Georgios Skoulakis.Do subjective expectations explain asset pricing puzzles?[J]. Journal of Financial Economics . 2010 (3)
  • 4Haluk Ergin,Faruk Gul.A theory of subjective compound lotteries[J]. Journal of Economic Theory . 2009 (3)
  • 5Peter Klibanoff,Massimo Marinacci,Sujoy Mukerji.Recursive smooth ambiguity preferences[J]. Journal of Economic Theory . 2008 (3)
  • 6Soo Hong Chew,Jacob S. Sagi.Small worlds: Modeling attitudes toward sources of uncertainty[J]. Journal of Economic Theory . 2007 (1)
  • 7Fabio Maccheroni,Massimo Marinacci,Aldo Rustichini.Dynamic variational preferences[J]. Journal of Economic Theory . 2006 (1)
  • 8Norio Takeoka.Subjective probability over a subjective decision tree[J]. Journal of Economic Theory . 2006 (1)
  • 9Andrew Caplin,John Leahy.The recursive approach to time inconsistency[J]. Journal of Economic Theory . 2005 (1)
  • 10Paolo Ghirardato,Fabio Maccheroni,Massimo Marinacci.Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude[J]. Journal of Economic Theory . 2003 (2)

共引文献292

同被引文献36

引证文献5

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部