摘要
目的探究CEREC嵌体与复合树脂嵌体修复儿童第一恒磨牙大面积缺损时的临床疗效。方法选取儿童Ⅱ类洞龋坏第一恒磨牙97颗,随机分成两组,并分别采用CEREC嵌体与复合树脂嵌体修复患牙因龋造成的牙体缺损,分别于术后3、6和12个月复查,并通过改良USPHS标准对临床疗效进行评价。结果术后3个月,CEREC嵌体组与复合树脂嵌体组的修复成功率分别为100.00%和97.96%,差异不具有统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6个月和术后12个月,两组的成功率分别为100.00%、95.65%和89.36%、80.00%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论使用CEREC嵌体修复儿童第一恒磨牙的Ⅱ类洞远期效果优于复合树脂嵌体。
Objective To investigate the value of CEREC all-ceramic inlay and composite resin inlay to restore badly broken-first permanent molars of children. Methods 97 badly broken-first permanent molars of children selected in our clinical trial were randomly divided into two groups. Both group cases restored with CEREC all-ceramic inlay and composite resin inlay respectively were evaluated by modified USPHS during 3-month, 6-month and 12-month. Results The overall effective rate were 100.00%, 100.00%, 97.78% in test group and 97.96%, 89.36%, 87.80% in control group3, 6 and 12 months after operation. There were no significant differences between the two groups 3 months after operation（P〉0.05）but significant difference 6 and 12 months after operation（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The long-term effect of CEREC all-ceramic inlay is better than composite resin inlays when repairing children＇s first permanent molars.
作者
胡加凤
傅露
王辉
HU Jiafeng;FU Lu;WANG Hui(Department of Pedodontics,Hangzhou West Dental Hospital Co.,Ltd.Hangzhou 310012)
出处
《现代口腔医学杂志》
CAS
2018年第4期209-212,共4页
Journal of Modern Stomatology
