摘要
对生育权问题的探讨应放在公私法分野的框架下进行。公法意义上的生育权是公民,包括男性和女性,请求国家或政府提供生育服务的权利;私法意义上的"生育权"既非人格权,亦非身份权,更非夫妻共有权利。对囚犯生育权问题的探讨主要局限于公法领域。非死刑犯是否享有生育权并非法律问题,而是一个执行刑罚的政策问题;死刑犯享有生育权在逻辑上是说不通的。因为给死刑犯提供生育服务与政府执行死刑判决的职责是互相矛盾的。
The discussion of the question of reproductive right should be conducted under the framework of the distinction between public and private law. Reproductive right in the meaning of public law is the right of citizens,including men and women, to request the state or the government to provide reproductive services. Reproductive right in the meaning of private law is neither the right of personality nor the right of identity, nor the right of both husband and wife. The discussion of the problem of procreation of criminals is mainly confined to the field of public law.Whether or not prisoners not sentenced to death should enjoy the reproductive rights is not a legal issue but a policy issue concerning the implementation of penalties. It is logically implausible for death row prisoners to have the right to reproductive rights. This is because the provision of childbirth services to death row criminals contradicts the government＇s duty to execute the death penalty.
作者
柴丽杰
贺小苗
CHAI Lijie;HE Xiaomiao
出处
《中华女子学院学报》
2018年第3期33-39,共7页
Journal of China Women＇s University
关键词
生育权
人格权
身份权
公法
私法
reproductive rights
personality rights
identity rights
public law
private law
