摘要
国内众多研究认为,日本的饭沼慾斋在其著作《草木图说》中首次将A.apiacea的中文名定为青蒿。通过笔者调查,发现《草木图说》第一版及饭沼慾斋亲笔稿本并无A.apiacea的相关记载,更提出据目前可查证到的史料,《草木图说目录草部》一书最早将A.apiacea定名为青蒿。作为日本引进的外来物种,日本本草学界对青蒿外形特征及日文名、中文名与拉丁名的对应问题进行了大量的探索,本文通过研究古典文献梳理了日本国内对于青蒿和黄花蒿的认识和鉴定过程,并结合现代田野调查对古代研究结果进行了重新审视,还探讨了《本草纲目》在引入日本后对认识和鉴定青蒿的影响,更进一步阐述形成这些认识的客观原因及得到的相关启示。
According to studies at home, it is said that the Latin name A. apiacea was first referred to in Chinese as qinghao by Yokusai IINUMA in his masterpiece Soumoku Zusetsu published in 1856. The authors, however, find that no A. apiacea is mentioned in both the 1 st edition of Soumoku Zusetsu and its manuscript version. The correspondence between A. apiacea and qinghao is found in Soumoku Zusetsu Mokuroku Soubu, which should be considered as the earliest mention according to current findings. Since the introduction of qinghao to Japan, multiple studies have been done on identification of the appearance characteristics and plant names in Japanese, Chinese and Latin. This paper reviews the identification process of qinghao and huanghuahao in Japanese herbal studies and reexamines those study results by field research. It further discusses how Bencao Gangmu（Compendium of Materia Medica） has been acting as a reference to Japanese studies on qinghao and elaborates on the objective reasons behind and all the insights we can get.
作者
久保辉幸
刘文俊
Teruyuki KUBO;LIU Wenjun(School of Oriental Language and Culture,Zhejiang Gongshang University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang,310018;School of Foreign Languages,Wuhan Institute of Technology,Wuhan,Hubei,430205)
出处
《自然辩证法通讯》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第8期71-78,共8页
Journal of Dialectics of Nature
关键词
青蒿
黄花蒿
江户时期
本草考证
Artemisia carvifolia
Artemisia annua
Edo Period
Botanical research
