期刊文献+

行政如何吸纳政治?一个基于地方公共预算过程的文献分析

How Adminitration Absorb Politics?A Documents Analysis on Local Public Budget Proccess
下载PDF
导出
摘要 我国公共预算过程体现了行政吸纳政治的特征。首先,承担特定职能的行政部门上报的预算测算体现了最初的利益表达的职能,因为在预算中权重较高的项目预算实际上表达出了承担特定职能的行政部门所对应的利益群体的诉求。同时,支出部门间职能的分工造成了利益表达的分割特征,而行政部门的分管领导的人格化特征影响着诉求的表达。此外,预算的平衡过程实际上就是利益整合的过程,其中财政部门和发改委发挥了较大作用,并且分管领导的人格化特征也起到了较大影响作用。总体上看,行政吸纳政治的过程具有"内输入"的特点,其相应特征包括:1.容易造成预算的"软约束"结果;2.利益整合过程的随机性强;3.利益表达和整合有可能演变为不同职能行政部门间的利益争夺;4.强化了行政体系的政治功能。 From the perspective of political function, the process of China' s public budget reflects the characteristics of political function through administration. The budget measurement submitted for specific functions of administrative departments reflects the initial interest expression , because the project budget which play an majority made by specific administrative Department expressed the corresponding interests of groups. At the same time, the division of functions among departments of expenditure has resulted in the segmentation of interest expression, and the impersonate of leaders in charge of administrative departments has affected the expression of demands. In addition, the budget revised process is in fact the process of in- terest integration, in which the financial sector and the development and reform commission play a greater role, in which the leadership of the personification of the characteristics also play a greater impact. On the whole, political function through administration process has the characteristic of "internal input", including its corresponding features. Firstly, easy to cause the budget "soft constraints" results. Secondly, the interests of the integration process seem random. Thirdly, interest expression and integration may initiation competition among different administrative departments. At last, and the political function of administrative sys- tern is strengthened.
作者 郑谦 Zheng Qian
出处 《兰州学刊》 CSSCI 2018年第8期32-44,共13页
关键词 行政 政治 公共预算 public administration politics public budget
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献48

  • 1马骏,侯一麟.中国省级预算中的非正式制度:一个交易费用理论框架[J].经济研究,2004,39(10):14-23. 被引量:142
  • 2马骏.中国的零基预算改革:来自某财力紧张省份的调查[J].中山大学学报(社会科学版),2005,45(1):58-67. 被引量:40
  • 3周琪.美学者研究中国的方法正在改变[J].中国新闻周刊,2006(26):85-85. 被引量:1
  • 4阿尔蒙德等.《比较政治学:体系、过程和路策》.曹沛霖等译.上海译文出版社,1987年版,第262-263页.
  • 5Gabriel A. Almond, Bingham G. Powell, Kaare Strom and Russell J. Dalton, Comparative Politics: A Theoretical Framework, New York.. Pearson Longman Press, 2004, p. 47.
  • 6Kenneth Lieberthal and Michel Oksenberg, Policy Making in China: Leaders, Structures, and Processes,Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988,p. 3.
  • 7Susan L. Shirk, The Political Logic of Economic Reform in China ,Berkeley: University of California Press, 1993, pp. 92- 98.
  • 8J. Keefe, Anatomy of the EP - 3 Incident, April 2001, Alexandria, VA: CNA Corp. , 2001.
  • 9Peter Hays Gries, "China' s ' New Thinking' on Japan", The China Quarterly, 2005 (184).
  • 10加加美光行.《协调与矛盾--中国的内政外交》.“现代中国学的课题与展望”国际会议,2006年11月,日本名古屋.

共引文献255

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部