摘要
关于刑法和民法之间法域冲突的排除问题,虽然"相对独立性说"为不少学者所主张,但从理论、立法与司法来看,"相对从属性说"更具合理性,但需要进一步提出刑法"何时绝对从属、何时相对从属"于民法的具体标准与判断规则。"保护法益说"不能担当起判断标准的角色,应当着眼于"目的—手段"关系的协调,从"规范保护目的"的视角进行具体分析。在刑法与民法规范保护目的一致的场合,刑法绝对从属于民法;在两者保护目的相异的场合,刑法相对从属于民法;刑法上的相关概念是否应与民法保持一致,也应基于规范保护目的的相同与否进行具体判断。根据上述具体规则,相对从属性说可以在立法论与解释论中发挥重要作用。
Regarding the exclusion of jurisdictional conflict between criminal law and civil law, although the ＂relative independence of criminal law theory＂ has been advocated by many scholars, taking into account the situation at the theoretical, legislative and judicial levels, the ＂relative subordination of criminal law theory＂ is more reasonable. However, it is still necessary to further put forward the specific standards and judgmental rules about when the criminal law is ＂absolutely subordinate to or relatively subordinate to＂ the civil law. The ＂law interest protection theory＂ cannot play the role of judgment criteria. It should focus on the coordination of the ＂purpose and means＂ relationship and carry out concrete analysis from the perspective of ＂normative protection purpose＂ When the criminal law and the civil law regulate the same ＂normative protection purpose＂, the criminal law is absolutely subordinate to the civil law; when the ＂normative protection purposes＂ of the criminal law and the civil law are different, the subordinate role of criminal law should be interpreted relatively; whether the concepts and doctrine in the criminal law are constrained by the civil law should also be judged by the conformity of ＂normative protection purpose＂. According to the above specific rules, ＂relative subordination of criminal law theory＂ could play a significant role in the legislative theory field and the interpretation theory field.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期84-104,共21页
China Legal Science
基金
国家社科基金项目"法秩序统一性视野中的刑民矛盾及其排除"(项目批准号:14BFX042)的阶段性研究成果之一
