摘要
目的探讨同指背逆行岛状皮瓣与邻指皮瓣修复指端缺损的效果。方法选择2016年1月—2017年12月我院收治的单指指端缺损患者70例,以随机数字表将其分为对照组与研究组各35例。对照组行邻指皮瓣修复治疗,研究组行同指背逆行岛状皮瓣治疗。评价对比两组的临床疗效。结果研究组治疗的优良率为97.14%,高于对照组77.14%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相较于邻指皮瓣,同指背逆行岛状皮瓣修复指端缺损的疗效更为理想,不仅皮肤质地柔软、外形美观,且可以有效保留伤指长度,利于预后手指功能重建。
Objective To explore the effect of reverse digital island flap and adjacent finger flap for repairing fingertip defects. Methods A total of 70 patients with single fingertip defects admitted in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2017 were randomly divided into control group and study group（35 cases）. The control group was treated with the adjacent finger flap, while the study group was treated with the same finger back reverse island flap. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was evaluated and compared. Results The excellent and good rate of the study group was 97.14%, which was higher than 77.14% of the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Compared with the adjacent finger flap, the reverse island flap with the same finger back is more effective in repairing the finger end defect. Not only the skin texture is soft and the appearance is beautiful, but also the length of the finger can be retained effectively, which is beneficial to the reconstruction of the finger function and is suitable for clinical popularization.
作者
刘雷
王博
李江
LIU Lei;WANG Bo;LI Jiang(Department of Emergency Orthropedic Surgery,Changping District Hospital,Beijing 102200,China)
出处
《中国卫生标准管理》
2018年第13期58-60,共3页
China Health Standard Management
关键词
同指背
逆行岛状皮瓣
邻指皮瓣
修复
指端缺损
效果
same finger back
reverse island flap
adjacent finger flap
repair
fingertip defect
effect
