摘要
通谋虚伪表示属于非自愿的意思表示瑕疵,可以分为虚构行为与隐藏行为两大类型,在基本原理上涉及意思自治与信赖保护原则。通谋虚伪表示与恶意串通行为不同,后者是当事人通谋为意思表示一致,而且具有损害第三人合法权益的意图。在通谋虚伪表示中,当事人之间虚构行为绝对无效,但是该无效不得对抗善意第三人。在存在隐藏行为的情形,不同的第三人之间有可能产生利益上的冲突,应确认外在的表见行为有效。《民法总则》第146条并未规定"通谋虚伪表示不得对抗善意第三人",应当通过司法解释予以完善。
A conspiracy hypocritical act, an involuntary true meaning of non-intention, is divided into fictional behaviors and hidden behaviors and involves with party autonomy and trust protection in the basic principle. Different from conspiracy hypocritical acts, malicious collusion acts are absolutely invalid, but the invalidity should not be against the goodwill of the concerned third party. In the case of hidden behavior, there may be a conflict of interests between different third parties, and it is necessary to confirm that the external table is effective. The situation should be improved through judicial interpretation since the article 146 of the General Principles of Civil Law does not stipulate that conspiracy hypocritical act does no harm against the goodwill third person.
作者
冉克平
RAN Ke-ping(School of Law,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China)
出处
《烟台大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期29-37,共9页
Journal of Yantai University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
基金
国家社科基金项目"意思表示瑕疵:学说与规范"(15FFX035)
关键词
通谋虚伪表示
虚构行为
隐藏行为
恶意串通
善意第三人
conspiracy hypocritical act
fictional behavior
hidden behavior
malicious collusion
goodwill third person
