期刊文献+

全模型迭代重建算法评价^(125)I粒子植入术后CT图像 被引量:4

Model-based knowledge-based iterative reconstruction in evaluation of CT images after ^(125)I seeds implantation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨全模型迭代重建(IMR)算法评价^(125)I粒子植入术后图像的应用价值。方法收集接受^(125)I粒子植入术及术后CT随访的16例腹部肿瘤患者,对扫描原始数据分别以滤波反投影法(FBP)、IMR和高级重建迭代(iDose^4)算法进行重建,比较3种重建方法图像的噪声、伪影指数(AI)、CNR和主观评分。结果 FBP重建图像的噪声、CNR及AI分别为(58.65±4.03)HU、1.09±0.43和51.60±9.23,iDose^4图像分别为(48.38±5.34)HU、1.29±0.48和43.77±4.91,IMR图像分别为(41.46±3.44)HU、1.58±0.56和38.51±4.64,3种重建方法图像的噪声、CNR及AI两两比较差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。IMR图像的主观图像质量评分显著高于FBP和iDose^4算法图像(调整后P<0.001,P=0.011)。结论 IMR算法获得的图像质量较高,可有效减少^(125)I粒子伪影,为^(125)I粒子植入术后随访与疗效评估提供了更佳方法。 Objective To investigate the application value of model-based knowledge-based iterative reconstruction(IMR)in evaluation of CT images after ^(125)I seeds implantation.Methods Totally 16 patients with abdominal tumors and CT follow-up after ^(125)I seeds implantation were enrolled.CT data were reconstructed with the filtered back projection(FBP),IMR and iDose^(4 )iterative reconstruction technique,respectively.The differences of noise,artifact index(AI),CNR and subjective scores were compared among three methods.Results The noise,CNR and AI of FBP images were(58.65±4.03)HU,1.09±0.43and 51.60±9.23,of iDose^(4 )images were(48.38±5.34)HU,1.29±0.48 and 43.77±4.91,of IMR images were(41.46±3.44)HU,1.58±0.56 and 38.51±4.64,respectively.The differences of pairwise comparisons among three methods on noise,AI and CNR were statistically different(all P〈0.05).The objective scores of IMR images were higher than those of FBP and iDose^(4 )images(adjust P〈0.001,P=0.011).Conclusion The images reconstructed with IMR have high quality,and can reduce the artifact of particle ^(125)I effectively,therefore providing a better approach for postoperative follow-up and curative effect evaluation after ^(125)I seeds implantation.
作者 韩佳悦 孙连鑫 沙琳 张晓虹 赖声远 HAN Jiayue;SUN Lianxin;SHA Lin;ZHANG Xiaohong;LAI Shengyuan(2.Department of Radiology,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University,Dalian 116027,China;Department of Radiology,Unit 32120 PLA,Dalian 116500,China)
出处 《中国医学影像技术》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第7期1090-1093,共4页 Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基金 辽宁省自然科学基金(20170540236)
关键词 体层摄影术 X线计算机 基于模型的完全迭代算法 125I粒子 金属伪影 Tomography X ray computed Model based knowledge based iterative reconstruction 125I seeds Metal artifacts
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献22

  • 1谷建伟,张丽,陈志强,邢宇翔.CT图像中金属伪影的快速校正[J].中国体视学与图像分析,2005,10(2):108-111. 被引量:21
  • 2张福君,吴沛宏,赵明,黄金华,范卫君,顾仰葵,刘健,张亮,卢鸣剑.CT导引下^(125)I粒子植入治疗胰腺癌[J].中华医学杂志,2006,86(4):223-227. 被引量:120
  • 3谷建伟,张丽,陈志强,邢宇翔.常用的几种插值方法在CT系统金属伪影校正中的性能比较[J].核电子学与探测技术,2006,26(6):905-907. 被引量:10
  • 4Barrett JF, Keat N. Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance. Radiographics, 2004,24(6) : 1679-1691.
  • 5Bal M, Spies L. Metal artifact reduction in CT using tissue-class modeling and adaptive prefiltering. Medical Physics, 2006,33 (8) :2852-2859.
  • 6Yu H, Zeng K, Bharkhada DK, et al. A segmentation-based method for metal artifact reduction. Acad Radiol, 2007, 14 (4): 495-504.
  • 7Xia D, Roeske JC, Yu L, et al. A hybrid approach to reducing computed tomography metal artifacts in intracavitary brachythera- py. Braehytherapy, 2005,4(1) :18-23.
  • 8Goldman LW. Principles of CT: radiation dose and image quali- ty. J Nucl Med Technol, 2007,35(4):213-225.
  • 9Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et ai. Strategies for CT radi- ation dose optimization. Radiology, 2004,230(3) :619-628.
  • 10Kim JC, Kim JH, Kim HC, et al. Effect of fiber structure ondialysate flow profile and hollow fiber hemodialyzer reliability: CT perfusion study. Int J Artif Organs, 2008,31 ( 11 ) : 944-950.

共引文献36

同被引文献31

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部