摘要
目的:观察急诊呼吸机阶段性治疗急危重症患者的临床疗效。方法:选取某院从2015年3月~2017年3月收治100例接受治疗的急危重症患者,对照组50例患者给予患者进行常规呼吸支持疗法治疗,实验组50例患者给予患者进行急诊呼吸机阶段性治疗,比较两组患者治疗效果。结果:治疗后,实验组总有效率为98.0%,对照组总有效率为88.0%,实验组高于对照组,两组数据差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);治疗后,实验组在呼吸机给氧、环甲膜穿刺、鼻导管吸氧及气管插管等与对照组没有差异性;治疗后,实验组呼吸恢复稳定所需要时间是(39.98±5.02)min,对照组呼吸稳定时间是(55.48±4.76)min,实验组低于对照组,两组数据差异具有统计学意义。结论:给予患者进行急诊呼吸机阶段性治疗,安全性高,满意度高,并发症发生率低,值得在临床推广使用。
Objective：To observe the clinical efficacy of emergency ventilator in the stage treatment of acute and critical patients.Methods：100 cases of critically ill patients treated in a hospital from March 2015 to March 2017 were selected and divided into control group（conventional respiratory support therapy）and experimental group（emergency ventilator treatment）,with 50 patients in each group,then the treatment effect was compared between the two groups.Results：After treatment,the total effective rate of the experimental group was 98.0%and the total effective rate of the control group was 88.0%.The experimentalgroup was higher than the control group,and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant（P〈0.05）.After treatment,there was no difference between the experimental group and the control group in the oxygen supply on the ventilator,the puncture of the ring thyroid membrane,the inhalation of oxygen in the nasal catheter and the tracheal intubation After treatment,the time of respiratory stabilization was（39.98±5.02）min in the experimental groupa nd（55.48±4.76）min in the control group,which was lower in the experimental group than in the control group.The difference between the two groups was statistically significant.Conclusion：It is safe for patients with emergency stage ventilator treatment,with high degree of satisfaction and low complication rate,which is worthy of promotion and application in clinical practice.
作者
张占胜
Zhang Zhansheng(Department Emergency,Mianchi County People＇s Hospital,Sanmenxia 47240)
出处
《数理医药学杂志》
2018年第9期1280-1282,共3页
Journal of Mathematical Medicine
