摘要
本文从设定经济增长基本方程出发,探讨了马克思主义与后凯恩斯主义经济学构建闭合增长模型的不同思路,进而对两种增长理论进行详细的比较分析。研究发现,马克思主义与后凯恩斯主义增长理论都对收入分配给予了特别的关注,并且都坚持阶级、制度、非均衡的分析方法;然而,两者在所依据的理论基础、经济增长的最终决定因素、资本主义经济增长是否存在极限以及增长过程中的市场结构等问题上仍存在明显分歧。与后凯恩斯主义增长理论相比,马克思主义增长理论在理论基础、研究视阈及内在逻辑一致性等方面都更具优势。全面比较马克思主义与后凯恩斯主义经济增长理论对于构建中国特色发展经济学具有重要的借鉴意义。
From the beginning of setting the basic equations of economic growth, this paper explored the different thoughts on the construction of closed growth model between Marxism economics and Keynesian economics to compare the two kinds of growth theory in detail. It found out that both Marxism and Post-Keynesian economic growth theory give special attention to income distribution, and they also in- sist on the same analysis methods such as class analysis, system analysis and disequilibrium analysis. However, there are still distinct differences between the two kinds of growth theory on the aspects of the- oretical basis, the fundamental determinants of economic growth, the existence of growth limit in capital- ist economy and the market structure in the process of growth. Compared to the Post-Keynesian economic growth theory, Marxism has the advantage on theoretical basis, research vision and internal logic consis- tency. The comprehensive comparison of Marxism and Post-Keynesian economic growth theory can pro- vide significant reference for the construction of Development economics with Chinese characteristics.
作者
王琨
闫伟
WANG Kun;YAN Wei(School of Economics,Renmin University of China;National Academy of Education Administration)
出处
《经济理论与经济管理》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第8期51-61,共11页
Economic Theory and Business Management
基金
北京市社会科学基金特别委托项目(15JGA018)
中国特色社会主义政治经济学本硕博(西部)论坛(2017年)的资助
关键词
马克思主义
后凯恩斯主义
经济增长理论
比较研究
中国特色发展经济学
Marxism
Post-Keynesian
economic growth.theory
comparative study
developmenteconomics with Chinese characteristics
