期刊文献+

中文版成人血友病活动能力评估量表的信度和效度研究 被引量:5

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the adult haemophilia activities list
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 检验成人血友病活动能力评估量表(HAL)汉化后的信度和效度。 方法 对原始问卷进行翻译、回译、校对后最终形成HAL中文版,将中文版HAL及中文版关节炎生活质量测量量表2-短卷(AIMS-SF)通过直接发放问卷或邮件形式交由华中科技大学同济医学院附属协和医院血友病诊疗中心登记治疗的成人血友病患者完成填写,共发放150例问卷,搜集到98例有效问卷,应用SPSS 20.0版统计软件对数据进行处理与分析,对问卷内部一致性信度、分半信度、内容效度、结构效度、聚集效度进行检验。 结果 问卷总量表及各维度的Cronbach′s α系数均在0.7以上;总量表的分半信度r=0.970,各维度分半信度均大于0.7;各维度得分与总分及各维度条目得分与该维度得分的Pearson相关系数均大于0.6;问卷各维度间相关系数小于各维度与总量表间的相关系数;HAL总分和AIMS2-SF总分及AIMS2-SF“躯体”维度得分相关性均较好(分别为r=0.640,P〈0.01;r=0.576,P〈0.01)。 结论 中文版HAL具有良好的信度和效度。 Objective To test the the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the adult haemophilia activities list (HAL). Methods A Chinese version of the HAL was prepared by translation, back-translation and revision. Adult hemophilia patients were used to test it and a short-form arthritis impact measurement scale (AIMS-SF) simultaneously. A total of 98 valid questionnaires were collected. The internal consistency, reliability, split-half reliability, content validity, construct validity and convergent validity were tested. Results The Cronbach′s α coefficients for the total questionnaire and its dimensions were all 0.7 or more. The half-reliability test produced a Spearman correlation coefficient of 0.97. The Pearson correlation coefficients relating each dimension score with the total score and each dimension′s entry score with the dimension score were all greater than 0.6. The correlation coefficient between the dimensions of the two questionnaires was smaller than the correlation coefficients relating each dimension with the total scale. There was relatively good correlation between the HAL sum score and the AIMS2-SF sum score (r=0.640, P≤0.01), as well as between the HAL sum score and the AIMS2-SF physical score (r=0.576, P≤0.01). Conclusion The Chinese version of the adult HAL has good reliability and validity.
作者 汪衍雪 杨朝辉 王刚 肖喜玲 徐小静 王华芳 Wang Yanxue;Yang Zhaohui;Wang Gang;Xiao Xiling;Xu Xiaojing;Wang Huafang(Department of Rehabilitation,Union Hospital of Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022,China)
出处 《中华物理医学与康复杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第8期608-612,共5页 Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
关键词 血友病 日常生活活动 评估 信度 效度 Haemophilia Arthritis Activity Assessment Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献21

  • 1任海,王凯珍,肖淑红,赵书祥,陈国强.论体育资源配置模式——社会经济条件变革下的中国体育改革(一)[J].天津体育学院学报,2001,16(2):1-5. 被引量:185
  • 2Meenan RF,Gertman PM,Mason JH.Measuring health status in arthritis:the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales[J].Arthritis Rheum,1980,23:146-152.
  • 3Meenan RF,Mason JH,Anderson JJ,et al.AIMS2:the content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales health status questionnaire[J].Arthritis Rheum,1992,35:1-10.
  • 4Guillemin F,Coste J,Pouchot J,et al.The AIMS2-SF:a short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2[J].Arthritis Rheum,1997,40:1267-1274.
  • 5Beaton DE,Bombardier C,Guillemin F,et al.Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures[J].Spine,2000,25:3186-3191.
  • 6Ren XS,Kazis L,Meenan RF.Short-form Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2:tests of reliability and validity among patients with osteoarthritis[J].Arthritis Care Res,1999,12:163-171.
  • 7Teal E,Rasker JJ,Riemsma RP.Psychometric properties of a Dutch short form of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (DutchAIMS2-SF)[J].Rheumatology,2003,42:427-434.
  • 8Rosemann T,Korner T,Wensing M,et al.Evaluation and cultural adaptation of a German version of the AIMS2-SF questionnaire (German AIMS2-SF)[J].Rheumatology,2005,44:1190-1195.
  • 9刘朝杰.问卷的信度与效度评价[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,1997,5(4):174-177. 被引量:214
  • 10巫秀美,倪宗瓒.因子分析在问卷调查中信度效度评价的应用[J].中国慢性病预防与控制,1998,6(1):28-31. 被引量:60

共引文献555

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部