摘要
20世纪60年代关于历史剧的论争是自五四时期历史剧概念诞生以来几次论争中的重要一环。其本质是观点相左的"窄化定义派"与"宽化定义派"两大阵营,在均承认"历史真实与艺术真实要统一"的前提下,继续追问"历史真实与艺术真实应该如何统一"而形成的狭义史剧观与广义、宽泛的史剧观之争。事实上,历史真实更加注重历史趋势、历史精神和历史意义的真实;艺术真实则是历史剧作为文学范畴不可或缺的组成部分。历史剧创作要厘定、廓清历史真实与艺术真实的"临界点",真正实现历史真实与艺术真实的"有机"统一。
Since the birth of the concept of historical drama in The May 4th Movement period,the debate on historical plays in 1960s has been an important part of several debates.Its essence is the argument on the view of historical dramas between the narrow-definition school and the broad-definition school,who continue to inquire into the unity of historical truth and artistic reality.In fact,historical truth pays more attention to the truth of historical trend,spirit and significance,while artistic reality is an integral part of historical dramas as a literary category.The creation of historical dramas must define,clarify the critical point between historical truth and artistic reality,and truly achieve the organic unity of the two.
作者
史长源
SHI Chang-yuan(School of Arts,Qufu Normal University,Qufu Shandong 273165,China)
出处
《菏泽学院学报》
2018年第4期49-52,共4页
Journal of Heze University
关键词
历史剧论争
历史真实
艺术真实
debate on historical drama
historical truth
artistic reality
