摘要
适时提出义务是实现集中审理的重要一环,而适时提出义务的正当性亦离不开集中审理的制度体系。受对策性立法的影响,举证时限与集中审理在制度构建过程中出现了背离:2001年《证据规定》为提升诉讼效率而规定举证时限,未能在集中审理的框架内整体谋划,而当时当事人证据收集手段与程序保障的不足,又进一步消减了证据失权的正当性;至2012年《民事诉讼法》及其后的《民诉法解释》,集中审理的改革思路初步形成,争点整理程序得以完善,但证据失权却流于空文。举证时限应在集中审理的制度框架下统筹规划,综合考虑当事人的证据收集能力与程序保障情况,重构宽严得当的失权制度。
The timely submitting obligation is an important part of a centralized trial while its legitimacy is also inseparable from the centralized trial system. Under the influence of countermeasure legislation,the time limit for proof and centralized trial have shown a divergence in the construction of the system. Civil Procedure Rules of Evidence adopted in 2001 described the proof limitation to improve the litigation efficiency,but not being considered in the whole framework of centralized judgment,so that it further cut down the legitimacy of evidence disqualification. The idea of centralized judgment was primarily formed until the Civil Procedure Law and the following Interpretation of Civil Procedure Law were adopted in 2012,but regretfully the evidence disqualification system was reduced to mere empty words. The time limit for proof should be planned according to the system of centralized judgment,taking into account the evidence collection capacity as well as guaranteeing due procedure,and reconstructing the evidence disqualification system of combining punishment with leniency.
作者
杨会新
YANG Hui-xin(National Prosecutors Coilege,Beijing 102206,China)
出处
《现代法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第4期150-160,共11页
Modern Law Science
基金
2016年度司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目中青年课题"‘立案登记制’后民事案件受理制度研究"(16SFB3023)
关键词
证据失权
诉讼促进
集中审理
证据收集
程序保障
evidence disqualification
promoting procedure
centralized judgment
evidence collection
procedure guarantee
