期刊文献+

关于基层医院腹腔镜阑尾切除术的临床疗效评价 被引量:1

Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in primary hospitals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨基层医院腹腔镜阑尾切除术的疗效。方法:收治阑尾炎手术患者406例,分为腹腔镜组100例和开腹组306例。比较腹腔镜组与开腹组的手术指标。结果:腹腔镜阑尾切除术占比呈明显升高趋势。腹腔镜组平均手术时间明显长于开腹组(P<0.01),平均住院时间短于开腹组(P<0.05),手术当天止痛剂使用率低于开腹组(P<0.01),切口感染率低于开腹组(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术具有痛苦少、恢复快、切口感染少等优点,是一种安全有效的术式。 Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in primary hospitals.Methods:406 patients with appendicitis operation were selected,and we compared the operative parameters between the laparoscopic group and the laparotomy group.Results:The proportion of laparoscopic appendectomy was increased significantly.In the laparoscopy group,the average operation time was significantly longer than that in the laparotomy group(P 〈 0.01),the average time of hospitalization was shorter than that in the laparotomy group(P〈 0.05),and the use rate of analgesics on the day of operation was lower than that of the laparotomy group(P 〈 0.01),and the rate of incision infection was lower than that of the laparotomy group(P 〈 0.05).Conclusion: Laparoseopie appendectomy had many advantages,such as less pain,quicker reeove^y- and less ilffeetion,it was a safe and effective procedure.
作者 金虎 太哲范 尹振洙 崔光筠 Jin Hu;Tai Zhefan;Yin Zhenzhu;Cui Guangyun(Department of General Surgery,Yanji City Hospital of Jilin Province 133000)
出处 《中国社区医师》 2018年第28期26-27,共2页 Chinese Community Doctors
关键词 腹腔镜阑尾切除术 腹腔镜 阑尾炎 Laparoscopic appendectomy Laparoscope Appendicitis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献94

  • 1吴志瑜,邓靖,王亮,赖钊,赵斌,杨玉辉,魏健,岳旋弟,张发强,章陈.腹腔镜阑尾切除术125例报告[J].腹腔镜外科杂志,2006,11(1):90-90. 被引量:12
  • 2吴孟超,吴在德.黄家驷外科学.7版,北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1585.
  • 3吴阶平,裘法祖.黄家驷外科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2008:1142-1156.
  • 4Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy [ J ]. Endoscopy, 1983, 15 (2) : 59 -64.
  • 5Heikkineo TJ, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A. Cost - effective appendectomy. Open or laparoscopic? A prospective randomized study [ J]. Surg Endosc, 1998, 12 (10): 1204-1208.
  • 6Williams MD, Collins JN, Wright TF, et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy [J]. South Med J, 1996, 89 (7): 668-674.
  • 7Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventionsversionS. 1. 0 (updated March 2011) [M/OL]. http : //www. cochrane - handbook. org/.
  • 8Frazee RC, Roberts JW, Symmonds RE, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing open versus laparoscopic appendectomy [ J ]. Ann Surg, 1994, 219 (6): 725-728.
  • 9Cox MR, McCall JL, Toouli J, et al. Prospective randomized comparison of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy in men [ J ]. World J Surg, 1996, 20 (3): 263-266.
  • 10Hansen JB, Smithers BM, Schache D, et al. Laparoscopie versus open appendectomy: prospective randomized trial [ J]. World J Surg,1996, 20 (1): 17-20.

共引文献299

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部