摘要
目的:对比分析风寒型周围性面瘫患者应用普通针刺疗法与温针灸治疗的优劣差异。方法:将我院2012年1月-2017年10月期间接受治疗的82例风寒型周围性面瘫患者选为观察对象,依据随机抽签法分为两组,即对照组(n=41)、试验组(n=41)。两组患者均接受药物口服治疗,在此基础上,对照组患者予以普通针刺疗法,试验组患者予以温针灸治疗,对两组患者临床疗效、H-B评分、面部残疾指数量表(FDI)评分予以统计比较。结果:试验组患者临床总有效率高于对照组患者,数据分别为97.6%、82.9%,对比差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。两组患者治疗后H-B评分、FDI评分(躯体)、FDI评分(社会)均降低,与治疗前相比,差异有统计学意义(P <0.05),且试验组患者H-B评分、FDI评分(躯体)低于对照组患者,比较差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论:风寒型周围性面瘫患者应用温针灸治疗的临床效果优于普通针刺疗法,值得临床进一步应用与普及。
Objective To compare efcacy of warm-acupuncture and acupuncture on PFP of the Fenghan type （风寒型 ）. Methods： 82 cases were divided into two groups, 41 cases in each group. The control group took acupuncture plus medicine. The experimental group was given warm-acupuncture plus medicine. Results： The total efciency was 97.6% in the experimental group, was better than 82.9% in the control group （P〈0.05）. H-B score, FDI score in two groups were decreased, with diference between before and after treatment （P〈0.05）, and those in the experimental group was lower （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Warm-acupuncture on PFP of the Fenghan type is more efective, and is worthy of promotion.
出处
《中医临床研究》
2018年第26期76-77,共2页
Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
关键词
风寒型周围性面瘫
普通针刺疗法
温针灸
临床疗效
Peripheral facial paralysis of the Fenghan type
Acupuncture
Warm-acupuncture
Clinical efcacy
