摘要
目的探究计划生育服务机构开展相关流产后计划生育服务效果观察。方法方便选取计划生育服务机构2015年2月—2016年11月收入240例接受人工流产妇女作为此次研究对象,按照入院先后顺序不同分为观察组和对照组,各120例,对照组实施常规人工流产,观察组实施人工流产之后进行计划生育服务,比较两组一般资料、干预前后避孕节育知识以及主动避孕率、非计划妊娠率比较。结果两组一般资料中观察组已婚人数占比为61.7%、未婚为38.3%、文化程度中初中以下20.8%、高中、中专25.8%、大专及以上53.3%、职业中职员30.8%、农民38.3%、其他25.8%、流产次数1次为55.8%、≥2次为44.2%、避孕方式主动避孕53.3%、避孕套20.0%、避孕药物10.0%、安全期6.7%、体外排精8.3%、紧急避孕1.7%与对照组63.3%、36.7%、21.7%、24.2%、54.2%、5.8%、29.2%、36.7%、28.3%、54.2%、45.8%、51.7%、18.3%、10.8%、6.7%、10.0%、2.5%比较,差异无统计学意义(χ~2=0.071,0.094,0.315,0.067,0.541,P>0.05),观察组干预前避孕节育知识得分为(6.13±0.51)分与对照组(6.21±0.49)分比较,两组差异无统计学意义(t=-1.276,P>0.05),观察组干预后避孕节育知识得分为(9.61±0.64)分,对照组为(6.31±0.54)分,两组差异有统计学意义(t=43.170,P<0.05),观察组主动避孕率80.0%高于对照组60.0%,差异有统计学意义(χ~2=19.780,P<0.05),观察组非计划妊娠率3.3%低于对照组12.5%,两组差异有统计学意义(χ~2=5.816,P<0.05)。结论针对流产后妇女大力开展相关计划生育服务,并加以实施,能够有效提高避孕节育知识得分,提高主动避孕率,降低非计划妊娠率,可以最大程度保护女性生殖健康。
Objective To explore the effect of family planning services on family planning services after abortion. Methods A total of 240 women with abortion were convenient selected from the family planning service institutions from February 2015 to December 2016. The subjects were divided into observation group and control group according to the order of admission. 120 cases were used in the control group. The control group was given routine abortion. After the abortion, the family planning service was carried out. The general information of the two groups, the knowledge of contraception and birth control before and after intervention, and the comparison of the active contraceptive rate and the unplanned pregnancy rate were compared. Results In the general data of the two groups, the proportion of married people in the observation group was 61.7%, the unmarried was 38.3%, the education level was 20.8% below junior high school, the high school, the secondary school was 25.8%, the college and above were 53.3%, the occupational staff was 30.8%, and the farmers 38.3%, other 25.8%, the number of abortions 1 time was 55.8%, ≥ 2 times was 44.2%, contraceptive active contraception 53.3%, condom 20.0%, contraceptive 10.0%, safety period 6.7%, in vitro 8.3%, emergency contraception 1.7% and control group 63.3%, 36.7%, 21.7%, 24.2%, 54.2%, 5.8%, 29.2%, 36.7%, 28.3%, 54.2%, 45.8%, 51.7%, 18.3%, 10.8%, 6.7%, 10.0%, 2.5%, the difference was not significant （χ2=0.071, 0.094, 0.315, 0.067, 0.541, P〉0.05）. The obsmvation group had the knowledge of contraceptive birth control before intervention （6.13±0.51）points and the control group （6.21±0.49）points, there was no significant difference between the two groups （t=- 1.276, P〉0.05）. The score of contraceptive knowledge after intervention was（9.61±0.64）points in the observation group and （6.31±0.54）points in the control group. The differences between the two groups were significant （t=43.170, P〈0.05）, the active contraceptive rate in the observation group was 80.0% higher than that in the control group 60.0%, and the difference was significant（χ2=19.780, P〈0.05）. Unplanned pregnancy rate 3.3%, 12.5%, lower than the control group, the difference was significant （χ2=5.816, P〈0.05）. Conclusion Aiming at the postabortion women＇s vigorous implementation of family planning services and their implementation, they can effectively increase knowledge of contraceptive birth control, increase active contraceptive rates, and reduee unplanned pregnancy rates, which can protect women＇s reproductive health to the greatest extent.
作者
卫丽丽
WEI Li-li(Nantong Tongzhou District,Maternal and Child Health,Family Planning Service Center,Nantong,Jiangsu Province,226300 China)
出处
《中外医疗》
2018年第25期53-55,共3页
China & Foreign Medical Treatment
关键词
计划生育服务机构
流产
干预效果
避孕
Family planning service institution
Abortion
Intervention effect
Contraception
