期刊文献+

降钙素原对鉴别肿瘤患者感染与肿瘤热的价值 被引量:4

Value of serum procalcitonin level in differentiation between infections and tumor-related fever in patients with malignant tumors
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评估降钙素原(PGT)检测在鉴别恶性肿瘤患者感染与肿瘤热中的价值。方法采用病例对照研究,回顾性分析2014年12月至2015年12月于安徽医科大学第一附属医院检测PCT的139例(173例次)肿瘤患者的病例资料,比较不同临床特征肿瘤患者的血清PCT水平;按患者是否发热及感染分为感染伴发热组(64例次)、感染不伴发热组(44例次)、肿瘤热组(36例次)及无感染及发热组(29例次),比较4组患者的PCT水平;用受试者操作特征曲线(ROC)评价PCT鉴别肿瘤患者感染与肿瘤热的价值。结果不同肿瘤类型及转移情况的感染患者中,PCT水平差异有统计学意义(χ^2=11.238、12.658,P=0.047、0.005),非感染患者中差异同样有统计学意义(χ^2=12.374、9.942,P:0.015、0.019)。感染伴发热组、感染不伴发热组、肿瘤热组和无感染及发热组患者的PCT水平分别为0.449(0.148,2.090)μg/L、0.107(0.056,0.441)μg/L、0.254(0.100,0.530)斗g/L和0.058(0.043,0.124)μg/L。肿瘤热组PCT水平与感染不伴发热组及血培养阴性的感染伴发热组[0.308(0.102,0.600)μg/L]比较,差异均无统计学意义(Z=-1.480、-0.965,P=0.139、0.334)。根据ROC曲线,PCT浓度以0.955μg/L为临界值,鉴别感染性发热及肿瘤热灵敏度为0.34,特异度为0.94。结论不同肿瘤类型及转移情况可影响肿瘤患者PCT水平,当发生肿瘤热时血清PCT水平可升高,并影响其诊断感染的价值。 Objective To assess the value of serum procalcitonin (PCT) level in the differentiation between infections and tumor-related fever in patients with malignant tumors. Methods Serum levels of PCT and related indicators were measured in 139 patients ( 173 times) with malignant tumors admitted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University from December 2014 to December 2015. There were 64 cases of infection with fever, 44 cases of infection without fever, 36 cases of tumor-related fever and 29 non- infection, non-fever cases. Serum PCT levels of patients in 4 groups were compared by non-parametric test, and the value of PCT in the differentiation of infections and tumor-related fever was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results There were significant differences in serum PCT levels among patients with different type of tumors ( χ^2 = 11. 238, P = 0. 047 ) and between patients with metastases and without metastases (χ^2 = 12. 658, P = 0. 005 ) in infected patients, as well as in non-infected patients (χ^2 = 12. 374,9. 942, P = 0. 015, 0. 019; respectively). The PCT levels of infection with fever group, infection without fever group, tumor-related fever group and non-infection, non-fever group were 0. 449 (0. 148,2. 090)μg/L, 0. 107 ( 0. 056, O. 441 ) μg/L, 0. 254 ( 0. 100, 0. 530 ) μg/L and 0. 058 ( 0. 043, 0. 124)μg/L, respectively. There was no significant difference in PCT levels between tumor-related fever group and infection without fever group (Z = - 1. 480, P = 0. 139 ) , between tumor-related fever group and blood culture negative infection with fever group (Z = -0. 965, P = 0. 334). According to the ROC, the cut- off value for PCT was defined at 0. 955 μg/L, the sensitivity and specificity of PCT in differentiation between infection and tumor-related fever was 0. 34 and 0. 94, respectively. Conclusion Tumor types and metastasis can affect serum PCT level, and PCT level can be increased in tumor-related fever, which would affect value of PCT in diagnosis of infection in tumor patients.
作者 张娜 孙耕耘 Zhang Na;Sun Gengyun(Department of Respiratory Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University,Hefei 230022,Anhui,China)
出处 《中华全科医师杂志》 2018年第9期709-713,共5页 Chinese Journal of General Practitioners
基金 国家临床重点专科建设项目基金(2012.649)
关键词 肿瘤 感染 降钙素原 肿瘤热 Neoplasms Infection Procalcitonin Tumor-related fever
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献13

  • 1Julián-Jiménez A,Gutiérrez-Martín P,Lizcano-Lizcano A,et al.Usefulness of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for predicting bacteremia in urinary tract infections in the emergency department[J].Actas Urol Esp,2015,39(8):502-510.
  • 2Cai ZH,Fan CL,Zheng JF,et al.Measurement of serum procalcitonin levels for the early diagnosis of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis[J].BMC Infect Dis,2015(15):55.
  • 3Tanrlverdi H,Tor MM,Kart L,et al.Prognostic value of serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels in critically ill patients who developed ventilator-associated pneumonia[J].Ann Thorac Med,2015,10(2):137-142.
  • 4McCoach CE,Rogers JG,Dwyre DM,et al.Paraneoplastic leukemoid reaction as a marker of tumor progression in nonsmall cell lung cancer[J].Cancer Treat Commun,2015(4):15-18.
  • 5Simon L,Gauvin F,Amre DK,et al.Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection:a systematic review and meta-analysis[J].Clin Infect Dis,2004,39(2):206-217.
  • 6Dabbous HK,Ali-Eldin FA,Montasser IM.Role of procalcitonin in diagnosis of bacterial infection in trans-arterial chemoembolisation treated hepatocellular carcinoma patients[J].Arab J Gastroenterol,2015,16(1):10-13.
  • 7Hur M,Moon HW,Yun YM,et al.Comparison of diagnostic utility between procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for the patients with blood culture-positive sepsis[J].Korean J Lab Med,2009,29(6):529-535.
  • 8Tulek B,Koylu H,Kanat F,et al.Serum C-reactive protein and procalcitonin levels in non-small cell lung cancer patients[J].Contemp Oncol(Pozn),2013,17(1):68-72.
  • 9Vladimirova SG,Tarasova LN,Dokshina IA,et al.The evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of technique of detection of C-reactive proteinunder diagnostic of infectious complications in patients with acute lymphoblastic leucosis receiving chemotherapy[J].Klin Lab Diagn,2014,59(11):17-21.
  • 10盛博,李志民.冠心病超敏C反应蛋白、肌钙蛋白T与心肌梗死面积的相关性研究[J].海南医学院学报,2010,16(10):1298-1300. 被引量:13

共引文献26

同被引文献39

引证文献4

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部