摘要
合同诈骗罪是从传统的诈骗罪中分离出来的罪名,但是设立合同诈骗罪的理由并不充分。合同诈骗罪的犯罪客体仅限于财产所有权,而所谓的对合同的监管制度并不应该是我国刑法犯罪客体的内容。在理论上,对合同的类型划分差强人意,无法准确地界定合同诈骗罪和诈骗罪的范围。在实践中,司法机关往往无视合同诈骗罪与诈骗罪的法条竞合关系,倾向于排除合同诈骗罪的适用。在处罚上,合同诈骗罪的处刑也有失均衡。合同诈骗罪的设立既无必要,也不合理,应当予以取消。
The contractual fraud crime is separated from the traditional crime of fraud, but there are not sufficient reasons to establish this crime. Regulation of the contract should not become the criminal object of contractual fraud crime. It＇s object is limited to property ownership. It is unsatisfactory to accurately define the scope of the contract. In practice, the judicial organs tend to ignore the application of the contractual fraud crime even if overlapping of law articles. Compared with other crime, the punishment of the contractual fraud crime is not balanced. To set up this crime is neither necessary nor reasonable, therefoer the contractual fraud crime should be cancelled.
作者
桂亚胜
GUI Ya-sheng(Shanghai University of International Business and Economics,Shanghai,201620)
出处
《湖南警察学院学报》
2018年第3期80-87,共8页
Journal of Hunan Police Academy
关键词
合同诈骗罪
犯罪客体
合同类型
法条竞合
contractual fraud crime
criminal object
the contract type
coincidence of articles
