期刊文献+

中心静脉导管胸腔闭式引流术连接便携式手动引流瓶治疗自发性气胸患者的疗效观察 被引量:2

Clinical efficacy of closed drainage by central venous catheter combined with portable manual drainage bottle as a technology in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察分析中心静脉导管胸腔闭式引流术接便携式手动引流瓶治疗自发性气胸患者的临床疗效。方法55例自发性气胸患者随机分为对照组25例和观察组30例,对照组采用胸腔闭式引流术接水封瓶加负压吸引治疗自发性气胸,观察组采用中心静脉导管胸腔闭式引流术接便携式手动引流瓶治疗自发性气胸,比较两组患者的临床疗效、引流时间、疼痛评分以及并发症情况。结果观察组临床总有效率(83. 3%)与对照组(80. 0%)比较差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05);观察组引流时间与对照组比较差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05);治疗后,观察组疼痛评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);观察组复张性肺水肿发生率(10. 0%)低于对照组(32. 0%),差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论中心静脉导管胸腔闭式引流术接便携式手动引流瓶治疗自发性气胸能降低患者疼痛和复张性肺水肿发生率。 Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of closed drainage by central venous catheter together with portable manual drainage bottle as a technology in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax. Methods 55 patients of spontaneous pneumothorax were firstly chosen as the subjects of study and divided into an experimental group( n = 30) and a control( n = 25). The control group was treated with traditional closed thoracic drainage bottle along with a water seal negative pressure drainage. The experimental group was treated with thoracic closed central venous catheter drainage together with portable manual drainage bottle. The clinical efficacy,drainage duration,pain score and complications in both groups were analyzed and compared. Results The rate of clinical efficacy as observed in the experimental group was83. 3%,which was similar to that of the control group( 80. 0%)( P〈0. 05). No significant difference was found between the two groups in drainage duration( P〈0. 05). After treatment,the pain score of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group( P〈0. 05). The rate of incidence of re-expansion pulmonary edema in the experimental group was 10. 0%,which was significantly lower than that of the control group( 32. 0%). The difference wasstatistically significant( P〈0. 05). Conclusions Closed drainage by central venous catheter together with portable manual drainage bottle as a technology for the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax can effectively reduce pain and the incidence of re-expansion pulmonary edema resulting from the process of treatment.
作者 陈汉才 葛建军 CHEN Han-cai; GE Jian-jun(Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First People' s Hospital of Linhai, Taizhou 317000, China)
出处 《健康研究》 CAS 2018年第5期538-540,共3页 Health Research
关键词 中心静脉导管 自发性气胸 便携式手动引流瓶 复张性肺水肿 central venous catheter spontaneous pneumothorax portable manual drainage bottle recurrent pulmonary edema
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献51

  • 1吴正琮,黄方仕,林敏.中心静脉导管闭式引流治疗自发性气胸的临床观察[J].临床肺科杂志,2005,10(5):641-642. 被引量:20
  • 2周志明,赵铮铮,刘永欣,王泽学.腋下小切口电视胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸82例[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2006,13(6):426-426. 被引量:21
  • 3王春珍,竺红宇.经皮穿刺留置导管治疗心包积液的护理体会[J].实用护理杂志,1997,13(1):21-22. 被引量:17
  • 4李辉.现代胸外科急症医学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2006:306-309.
  • 5Gamulka B,Mendoza C,Connolly B.Evaluation of a unique,nurse-inserted,peripherally inserted central catheter program[J].Pediatrics,2005,115(6):1602.
  • 6覃家锦 冯旭.两种胸腔闭式引流术治疗自发性气胸的临床研究.实用心脑肺血管杂志,20(03).
  • 7Henry M, Arnold T, Harvey J, et al. BTS guidelines for the management of spontaneous pneumothorax[J]. Thorax, 2003, 58:39ii-52
  • 8Baumann MH, Strange C, Heffner JE, et al. Management of spontaneous pneumothorax[J]. Chest, 2001,119:590-602
  • 9陈恩国 周道扬 应可净.深静脉留置管作胸腔闭式引流治疗气胸[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2000,9(5):310-310.
  • 10陆再英,钟南山.内科学[M].第7版.北京:人民卫生出版社.2008:251.

共引文献51

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部