摘要
"一带一路"建设所覆盖的沿线国家在政治、经济、法律、文化和宗教信仰方面存在巨大的差异。解决我国与沿线国家之间的民商事争议不能仅靠我国自身提高涉外司法水平、提高涉外仲裁质量的方式实现。现有国际争议解决机制对于我国与"一带一路"沿线国家之间而言,存在一定缺陷和不足。我国应当有针对性地积极发起和倡议建设新的国际民商事争议解决机制,采取双边和多边协定并行的方式,推动沿线国家之间就民商事司法协助达成普遍性的协议;推动联合仲裁和建设沿线国家间的国际仲裁机构;推动采用多元化争议解决方式,实现联合调解和国际调解中心调解的法律执行力。通过多层次的系统建构,为"一带一路"建设提供有力的法律保障。同时,也以此作为我国贡献给世界的公共产品,为跨国民商事争议解决提供新的思路和途径。
The countries covered by＂Belt and Road＂construction vary in the aspects of the politics, economy, legal system, culture and religion. To resolve the civil and commercial disputes between China and other countries along the Belt and Road Initiative cannot be only relied upon promoting our trial and arbitral level.There are some defects and drawbacks in the present international system on resolving international civil and commercial disputes. China should actively propose and initiate a new system on these disputes by bilateral and multilateral methods so as to promote unique treaties on the judicial assistance among the countries covered by＂Belt and Road＂construction, to drive combining arbitration and the establishment of international commercial arbitration institute among the countries, and to push diversified dispute solution to realize the legal force of combining mediation and the one issued by the international mediation center. The multi-level system construction provides the powerful legal safeguard for＂Belt and Road＂construction. At the same time, it also serves as the public product that China contributes to the world and provides new ideas and approaches for the settlement of transnational civil and commercial disputes.
出处
《求是学刊》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第5期82-90,共9页
Seeking Truth
关键词
“一带一路”
国际民商事争议
多边争议解决机制
Belt and Road Initiative
international civil and commercial disputes
multilateral methods ondispute resolution
