摘要
Two types of uncertainty co-exist in the theory of evidence： discord and non-specificity.From 90s, many mathematical expressions have arisen to quantify these two parts in an evidence.An important aspect of each measure presented is the verification of a coherent set of properties.About non-specificity, so far only one measure verifies an important set of those properties. Very recently, a new measure of non-specificity based on belief intervals has been presented as an alternative measure that quantifies a similar set of properties（Yang et al., 2016）. It is shown that the new measure really does not verify two of those important properties. Some errors have been found in their corresponding proofs in the original publication.
Two types of uncertainty co-exist in the theory of evidence： discord and non-specificity.From 90s, many mathematical expressions have arisen to quantify these two parts in an evidence.An important aspect of each measure presented is the verification of a coherent set of properties.About non-specificity, so far only one measure verifies an important set of those properties. Very recently, a new measure of non-specificity based on belief intervals has been presented as an alternative measure that quantifies a similar set of properties（Yang et al., 2016）. It is shown that the new measure really does not verify two of those important properties. Some errors have been found in their corresponding proofs in the original publication.
基金
supported by the Spanish ‘‘Ministerio de Economíay Competitividad"
by ‘‘Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional"(FEDER)(No.TEC2015-69496-R)
