期刊文献+

直肠癌根治术中全身麻醉复合硬膜外麻醉临床效果分析 被引量:1

Clinical Efficacy Analysis of General and Epidural Compound Anesthesia in Radical Surgery for Rectal Carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 为探讨全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉在直肠癌根治手术中的临床效果,将2015年9月至2017年8月我院收治的140例直肠癌患者,随机分为对照组和观察组,每组各70例。在直肠癌根治手术中,对照组给予全身麻醉,观察组给予全身麻醉联合硬膜外麻醉。比较2组患者每个时期(麻醉时、插管时、拔管时、拔管后20 min)的血压、心率、不良反应率,以及治疗总有效率。结果显示,观察组患者在麻醉、插管、拔管时和拔管后20 min的血压分别为(84.2±2.9) mmHg、(82.0±3.9) mmHg、(81.0±3.7) mmHg、(85.2±4.0) mmHg,心率分别为(80.9±8.9)次/分、(77.9±9.8)次/分、(79.1±10.7)次/分、(82.1±11.9)次/分,显著下降且之后均趋于平稳,而对照组血压及心率上升且不稳定,2组数据对比差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。对照组患者不良反应发生率为10.00%,明显高于观察组的2.86%,P<0.05。观察组患者治疗总有效率为97.14%(68/70),对照组为85.71%(60/70),观察组显著优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结果表明,直肠癌根治手术中全身麻醉复合硬膜外麻醉的临床效果显著,较单纯应用全身麻醉,患者生命体征更平稳,对患者的免疫功能影响更小,不良反应发生率低,安全性高,具有临床应用及推广价值。 To investigate the clinical efficacy of general and epidural compound anesthesia (GECA) in rec- tal carcinoma radical surgery,140 cases admitted in author's hospital(2015-09--2017-08) were randomly di- vided into control group(70 cases,under general anesthesia) and observation group (70 cases, under above compound anesthesia), then both group's blood pressure(BP), heart rate(HR), untoward reaction incidence at following time points(anesthesia,intubation,extubation and 20 rain after extubation), and total effective rate were compared.As results,in above all indexes observation group was all superior to control one[at 4 time points,BP.(84.2±2.9)mmHg,(82.0±3.9) mmHg,(81.0±3.7) mmHg,(85.2±4.0) mmHg;HR. (80.9±8.9) times/min, (77.9 ± 9.8) times/rain, (79.1 ± 10.7) times/rain, (82.1 ± 11.9) times/min; unto- ward reaction incidence. 2.86 % vs 10.00%;total effective rate: 97.14% (68/70) vs 85.7(60/70)] ,there was significantly statistical difference between the two groups,all, P 〈0.05.as for BP,obsevation group be- come stable following signficantly declined,but in control group BP and HR uplifted and unstable.Results show that above compound anesthesia has significant clinical efficacy, and less influence on patients' immu- no-function,lower untoward reaction incidence,higher safety and more stable patients' vital signs than a- lone general anesthesia.It has clinical application and popularization value.
作者 滕晓君 TENG Xiao-jun(Anesthesia Dept.,the People's Hospital of Jian'an District,Xuchang,Henan 461000)
出处 《中国肛肠病杂志》 2018年第9期15-17,共3页 Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
关键词 直肠癌根治术 全身麻醉 硬膜外麻醉 临床效果 Rectal carcinoma radical surgery General anesthesia Epidural anesthesia Clincial efficacy
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献86

  • 1刘骥,钟京,方伟武,李强.老年患者全身麻醉复合硬膜外麻醉术后寒战1例[J].总装备部医学学报,2012(2):121-121. 被引量:1
  • 2庞富安.对进行直肠癌根治术的患者实施硬膜外麻醉复合全身麻醉的效果观察[J].当代医药论丛,2014,12(9):204-205. 被引量:13
  • 3潘志忠,万德森,张昌卿,邵建永,李力人,陈功,周志伟,卢震海,王福龙.大切片P53免疫组化染色对判断直肠癌远端扩散长度的临床意义[J].癌症,2004,23(10):1199-1202. 被引量:18
  • 4刘展,汪晓东,李立.结直肠外科快速流程内容及依据[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2007,14(4):469-473. 被引量:21
  • 5Heald R J, Smedh RK, Kald A, et al. Abdominoperineal excision of the rectum: an endangered operation. Dis Colon Rectum, 1997, 40:747-751.
  • 6Barabouti DG, Wang WD. Current management of rectal cancer: total mesorectal excision (nerve sparing) technique and clinical outcome. Surg Oncol CIin N Am, 2005, 14:137-155.
  • 7Nagtegaal ID, Marijnen CA, Kranenbarg EK, et al. Circumferential margin involvement is still an important predictor of local recurrence in rectal carcinoma: not one millimeter but two millimeters is the limit. Ann J Surg Pathol, 2002, 26:350-357.
  • 8Nagtegaal ID, Quirke P. What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modem treatment of rectal cancer? J Clin Oncol, 2008, 26:303-312.
  • 9Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayaw~ K, et al. Colmec~ endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol, 2008 ~ 43:641-651.
  • 10Landmann RG, Wong WD, Hoepfl J, et al. Limitations of early rectal cancer nodal staging may explain failure after local excision. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007, 50:1520-1525.

共引文献213

同被引文献11

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部