摘要
目前我国的合宪性审查制度尚未将狭义法律纳入审查对象,无法有效阻止其侵害公民基本权利现象的发生。通过借鉴德国司法机关的"具体规范审查"制度、"宪法诉愿"制度以及法国司法机关的"违宪先决问题"制度,可以建立以案件受理法院提请为主、以基本权利主体提请为补充的合宪性审查提请制度。在该制度中,通过两次案件筛选程序可以切实减轻合宪性审查机关的工作压力,并有效地对宪法规定的基本权利提供保护。此外,针对狭义法律的合宪性审查也应遵循合宪性推定等审查原则。最终,审查机关可以作出否认提请、合宪确认、违宪确认以及不一致宣告、吁请裁判等审查结论。
By drawing on the German judicial systems of "conventional review" and the "constitutional appeal", as well as the French judicial system of "pre-constitutional issues", it is possible toestablish a system, which basis mainly on courts' requests. In this system, through two case screeningprocedures, the work pressure of the constitutional review subject can be effectively reduced, and thebasic rights stipulated in the Constitution can be effectively protected. In addition, the constitutionalreview of law should also follow the principle of review such as the principle of constitutional pre-sumption. Finally, the review authority shall come to several results, including the denial of the re-quest, the constitutional confirmation, the unconstitutional confirmation, the inconsistent declaration,and the appeal.
出处
《中国高校社会科学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第6期56-64,155,共9页
Social Sciences in Chinese Higher Education Institutions
基金
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"宪法‘人权条款’实施状况研究"(16JJD820030)阶段性成果
关键词
狭义法律
基本权利
合宪性审查
具体规范审查
narrow-legged law
basic law
constitutional review
conventional review
