摘要
目的探讨唾液酸酶法检测细菌性阴道病的诊断价值。方法选取2017年6月～2018年5月在本院妇科门诊疑似细菌性阴道病1073例患者,同时对其给予唾液酸酶法和Amsel法,比较这两种诊断方法对细菌性阴道病患者的诊断结果,并对其临床诊断价值进行分析。结果唾液酸酶法与Amsel法对细菌性阴道病的确诊率相似,差异无统计学意义(P<0.05)。用Amsel法做参照,唾液酸酶法检测细菌性阴道病的敏感性为88.60%,特异性为95.15%。结论唾液酸酶法可更加客观的区分将细菌性阴道病的阳性和阴性,并且敏感性、特异性和总符合率均较高,可以作为检测该病的有效辅助诊断方法。
Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of sialidase method in detection of bacterial vaginosis.Methods From June 2017 to May 2018, 1073 patients with suspected bacterial vaginosis were selected from gynecological outpatient department of our hospital. They were given sialidase method and Amsel method to compare the diagnostic results of these two methods for patients with bacterial vaginosis. And its clinical diagnostic value was analyzed.Results The sialidase method and the Amsel method were similar in the diagnosis rate of bacterial vaginosis, and the difference was not statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Using the Amsel method as a reference, the sensitivity of the sialidase assay for detecting bacterial vaginosis was 88.60% and the specificity was 95.15%. Conclusion The sialidase method can distinguish the positive and negative of bacterial vaginosis more objectively, and the sensitivity, specificity and total coincidence rate are higher, which can be used as an effective auxiliary diagnosis method for detecting the disease.
作者
王君
WANG Jun(Department of Clinical Laboratory,the Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College,Shantou 515041 Guangdong,China)
出处
《医学信息》
2018年第22期164-165,共2页
Journal of Medical Information
