期刊文献+

前臂骨密度测定诊断绝经后类风湿关节炎合并骨质疏松的价值 被引量:2

Diagnostic value of forearm bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察绝经后女性类风湿关节炎(RA)患者前臂骨密度(BMD)的变化,探讨前臂BMD对骨质疏松的诊断价值。方法选取绝经后女性RA患者193例,双能X线吸收法(DXA)测量非受力(左)侧前臂远端1/3处BMD,并测量中轴部分[正位腰椎(L2~4段)及左髋部]BMD。根据中轴部位BMD值,将RA患者分为正常及异常者,比较不同患者前臂BMD、骨矿含量及T值。采用ROC曲线分析前臂BMD对不同部位骨质疏松的预测价值。结果中轴BMD值异常164例,其中骨量减少71例,骨质疏松74例,严重骨质疏松19例;中轴BMD值正常仅29例。前臂BMD值异常146例,其中骨量减少60例,骨质疏松67例,严重骨质疏松19例;前臂BMD值正常47例。中轴BMD正常者年龄明显小于异常者,前臂BMD、骨矿含量及T值均明显优于异常者,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。腰椎、左髋部BMD正常者年龄均明显小于异常者,前臂BMD、骨矿含量及T值均明显优于异常者,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。ROC曲线显示:前臂BMD诊断腰椎骨质疏松的AUC为0.932,最佳T值为0.355,灵敏度为0.814,特异度为0.951;前臂BMD诊断左髋部骨质疏松的AUC为0.955,最佳T值为0.365,灵敏度为0.776,特异度为0.973。结论前臂BMD对腰椎、左髋部骨质疏松的诊断准确性较高,可作为诊断绝经后女性RA患者椎体、髋部骨质疏松的辅助工具。 Objective To assess the value of forearm bone mineral density(BMD) for diagnosis of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with rheumatoid arthritis(RA). Methods One hundred and ninety three female RA patients were enrolled in the study. BMD of lumbar vertebrae, left hip and distal forearm were measured by dual energy X-ray (DXA). With BMD value of the central axis as gold standard the ROC curve was used to analyze the diagnostic value of forearm BMD for osteoporosis in RA patients. Results There were 164 cases of abnormal BMD in the central axis, including 71 cases of bone loss, 74 cases of osteoporosis, 19 cases of severe osteoporosis. There were 146 cases of abnormal BMD in the forearm, including 60 cases of bone loss, 67 cases of osteoporosis, 19 cases of severe osteoporosis. The age of patients with normal BMD in central axis was significantly lower than that of abnormal BMD patients (P〈0.01). The BMD, bone mineral content and T value of the forearm in normal patients were significantly better than those in abnormal patients (all P〈0.01). The BMD, bone mineral content and T value in the forearm of patients with normal BMD in the lumbar spine and left hip were significantly better than those in the abnormal ones(all P〈0.01). The ROC curve showed that the forearm BMD in diagnosis of lumbar osteoporosis had an AUC of 0.932, and the best T value was 0.355, the sensitivity was 0.814, and the specificity was 0.951. The forearm BMD in diagnosis of the left hip osteoporosis had an AUC of 0.955, and the T value was 0.365, the sensitivity was 0.776, and the specificity was 0.973. Conclusion The forearm BMD has high diagnostic accuracy for lumbar and left hip osteoporosis, and can be used as an auxiliary tool for diagnosing vertebral and hip osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with RA.
作者 陈杨畅 李素蘋 项光博 金珍木 CHEN Yangchang;LI Supin;XIANG Guangbo(Department of Rrheumatology,Wenzhou Central Hospital,Wenzhou 325000,China)
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2018年第22期2466-2469,共4页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
关键词 类风湿关节炎 前臂骨密度扫描 绝经后女性 分布规律 骨质疏松 Rheumatoid arthritis Forearm bone mineral density scanning Postmenopausal women Distribution Osteoporosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献90

  • 1刘茗露,王光辉,尹华,俞士水,唐肇波,王名晶.阿仑膦酸钠治疗老年骨质疏松的临床疗效[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(4):917-918. 被引量:18
  • 2刘珺,王维,童琼娟,刘煌辉,欧阳彬.双能X线骨密度仪(DXA)与定量CT(QCT)测量骨密度的比较研究[J].临床放射学杂志,2007,26(5):504-507. 被引量:30
  • 3Raza K. The Michael Mason prize: early rheumatoid arthritis--the window narrows [J].Rheumatology (Oxford), 2010,49(3):406-410.
  • 4Freeston JE, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG, et al. A diagnostic algorithm for persistence of very early inflammatory arthritis: the utility of power Doppler ultrasound when added to conventional assessment tools [J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 2010,69(2):417-419.
  • 5Klarenbeek NB, Allaart CF, Kerstens PJ, et al. The BeSt story: on strategy trials in rheumatoid arthritis [J].Curr Opin Rheumatol, 2009,21(3):291-298.
  • 6Aletaha D, Breedveld FC, Smolen JS. The need for new classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis[J]. Arthritis Rheum, 2005, 52(11):3333-3336.
  • 7Fujii K, Koyama Y, Rokutanda R, et al. Usefulness of the new ACR/EULAR Classification Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis in the differential diagnosis between elderly-onset Rheumatoid arthritis and polymyalgia rheumatica[J]. Ann Rheum Dis ,2010,69(Supp13):376.
  • 8Fransen J, Hazes M, Visser H, et al. Validity of the revised ACR/EULAR Diagnosis Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis:predicting persistent arthritis and joint erosion after 2years in patients with early undifferentiated arthritis[J]. Ann Rheum Dis ,2010,69(Suppl3):148.
  • 9Varache S, Cornec D, Morvan J, et al. Diagnosis value of ACR/EULAR Criteria for Rheumatoid Arthritis in a two year cohort [J]. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69(Suppl3):500.
  • 10Villeneuve E, Nam JL, Wakefield R J, et al. Performance of the ACR-EULAR RA Criteria in patients with newly diagnosed inflammatory arthritis[J]. Rheum Dis ,2010,69 (Suppl3):522.

共引文献288

同被引文献28

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部