摘要
短缩二行为犯中的特定目的不同于犯罪目的。将二者等同不仅有可能陷入＂心态刑法＂,也会违反＂禁止重复评价原则＂,在共同犯罪的情况下也会得出错误结论,因此以这种观点为基础,认为短缩的二行为犯的主观罪过只能是直接故意的看法并不妥当。特定目的作为区分罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪的要素,应当将其视为独立于故意的主观违法要素。基于此,在短缩的二行为犯中就会出现行为人追求特定目的而放任危害结果发生的情况,符合间接故意的特征,因此,短缩的二行为犯的主观罪过可以是间接故意。同理,在共同正犯情形下,应当采取行为共同说,各行为人在各自的罪名范围内成立共同正犯。
The specific purpose of shrinking two behavior offenses is different from the criminal purpose. If we don＇t think like that,we will not only fall into＂subjective criminal law＂ but also break the ＂prohibition of repeated evaluation principles＂. According to this view,it is wrong to think that the subjective of shrinking two behavior offenses can only be direct intent. The specific purpose as a distinction between crime and non-crime should be regarded as independent of intentional subjective elements of law. On the basis of that,the shrinking two behavior offenses have two different purposes,which is consistent with the characteristics of indirect intent,therefore,the subjective of shrinking two behavior offenses can be indirect intent. Similarly,in group criminality,they are found accomplices of different charges.
作者
管馨宇
Guan Xinyu(School of Criminal Justice,Zhongnan University of Economics of law,Wuhan 430073,China)
出处
《中南财经政法大学研究生学报》
2017年第4期150-154,共5页
Journal of the Postgraduate of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
关键词
短缩的二行为犯
特定目的
犯罪目的
间接故意
Shrinking Two Behavior Offenses
Specific Purposes
Criminal Purpose
Indirect Intent
