期刊文献+

经导管硬化疗法与高位结扎术治疗精索静脉曲张的疗效及安全性比较 被引量:6

Comparison of efficacy and safety between catheter-directed retrograde foam sclerotherapy and laparoscopic varicocelectomy for patients with varicocele
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较经导管泡沫硬化剂逆行注射疗法与腹腔镜下精索静脉高位结扎术治疗精索静脉曲张的疗效。方法对101例原发性左侧精索静脉曲张患者行经导管泡沫硬化剂逆行注射治疗(硬化剂组),同期另105例行腹腔镜下精索静脉高位结扎术(高位结扎组)。比较两组患者的住院时间、治疗费用、术后并发症发生率、手术前后精液指标(精子密度、前向运动及正常形态精子比例)以及术后复发率。结果所有患者均顺利完成手术;术后随访12个月,患者症状均明显改善,无深静脉血栓、肺栓塞等严重并发症发生。硬化剂组患者泡沫硬化剂使用量为4~7(5.05±1.05)ml,术中造影精索静脉反流均消失;住院时间(3.55±0.69)d、住院费用(6 634.72±680.24)元、术后鞘膜积液发生率12.9%、阴囊坠胀发生率14.9%分别低于高位结扎组的(5.56±0.89)d、(8640.36±853.88)元、41.0%和25.7%(均P<0.05)。两组患者术后6、12个月精子密度、前向运动比例和正常形态精子比例均较入院时明显改善(均P<0.05),组间比较差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);组间精索静脉曲张复发率比较,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05)。结论与腹腔镜下精索静脉高位结扎术相比,经导管泡沫硬化剂逆行注射疗法疗效相当,但患者创伤小、恢复快、费用低。 Objective To compare the efficacy and safety between catheter-directed retrograde foam sclerotherapy and laparoscopic varicocelectomy in treatment of patients with varicocele. Methods Patients with primary left varicocle were treated with catheter-directed retrograde sclerotherapy (sclerotherapy group, n=101) or laparoscopic varicocelectomy (varicocelectomy group, n=105). The length of hospital stay, hospital costs, complication rate, semen index, recurrence rate were compared between two groups. Results The treatment completed successfully in both groups. After 12 months of postoperative follow-up, the symptoms of all patients were improved with no recurrence in both groups. The volume of the foam in the sclerotherapy group was 4?7(5.05 ± 1.05)ml, and intraoperative angiography showed that reflux disappeared in all patients. The length of stay [(3.55 土 0.69)d vs (5.56 ±0.89)d], hospital costs [(6634.72 ±680.24)Yuan vs (8640.36 ± 853.88)Yuan], hydrocele rate (12.9% vs 41.0%) and scrotum fall-swell rate (14.9% vs 25.7%) in sclerotherapy group were significantly lower than those in varicocelectomy group (P<0.05). The sperm count, sperm motility and sperm morphology were significantly improved 6, 12 months after the treatment in both groups (P <0.05), there was no significant difference in sperm analysis between two groups (P >0.05). Conclusion Catheter-directed retrograde foam sclerotherapy has the same efficacy as laparoscopic varicocelectomy, with advantages of less injury, fast recovery and low cost in treatment of varicocele patients.
作者 王林君 孟路阳 王彦彬 王松茂 董阳民 诸靖宇 WANG Linjun;MENG Luyang;WANG Yanbin(Department of Vascular Surgery, Hangzhou Third People's Hospital,Hangzhou 310009, China)
出处 《浙江医学》 CAS 2017年第6期452-455,共4页 Zhejiang Medical Journal
关键词 精索静脉曲张 经导管泡沫硬化剂逆行注射疗法 腹腔镜下精索静脉高位结扎术 Varicocele Catheter-directed retrograde foamsclerotherapy Laparoscopic varicocelectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献16

  • 1金保方.介入结合中药治疗精索静脉曲张所致不育症的临床研究[J].中国中西医结合影像学杂志,2003,1(2):107-109. 被引量:1
  • 2丁强,孙长华,黄永刚,于雷,刘国斌,史东民.精索静脉曲张患者精索内静脉-腹壁下静脉转流术疗效观察[J].中华男科学杂志,2006,12(2):181-182. 被引量:14
  • 3Zini A.Varicocele:evaluation and treatment[J].J Sex Reprod Med,2002,2:119-124.
  • 4Tessari L.The "Turbillon turbulence" Tessari's method with the three-way tap device[M].Henriet JP.Foam Sclerotherapy State of the Art.75015 Paris France 2002,1:51-55.
  • 5Cozzolino DJ,Lipshultz LI.Varicocele as a progressive lesion:po-sitive effect of varicocele repair[J].Hum Reprod Update,2001,7:55-58.
  • 6Su LM,Goldstein M,Schlegel PN.The effect of varicocelectomy on serum testosterone levels in infertile men with varicoceles[J].J Urol,1995,154:1752-1755.
  • 7Goldstein M.New insights into the etiology and treatment of infe-rtility[J].J Urol,1997,158:1808-1809.
  • 8Bergan J,Cheng V.Foam sclerotherapy for the treatment of vari-cose veins[J].Vascular,2007,15:269-272.
  • 9Breu FX,Guggenbichler S,Wollmann JC.2nd European Con-sensus Meeting on Foam Sclerotherapy 2006,Tegernsee,Germany[J].Vasa,2008,37(Suppl)71:1-29.
  • 10单鸿,罗鹏飞,李彦豪.临床介入治疗学.广州:广东科技出版社,1997.112.

共引文献26

同被引文献70

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部