期刊文献+

专利保险的功能、缺陷与中国的制度建构探析 被引量:5

Analysis of Functions, Defects of Patent Insurance and Its System Construction in China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 专利保险是20世纪80年代脱胎于美国的商业一般责任保险,而后渐趋独立的保险类型,并在欧洲和日本都得到了一定程度的发展。对被保险人而言,专利保险具有分担诉讼费用、缓解资金压力和增强议价能力等直接作用。对一国的经济发展而言,专利保险还可以激励技术创新,促进专利实施,均衡产业结构,规范市场竞争和深化专业分工。但是,专利保险也存在着价格偏高而难以推广,风险预测和评估困难,理赔程序复杂和容易诱发道德风险等缺陷。我国应结合2011年年底以来试点的情况建立有利于发挥其基本功能和弥补其主要缺陷的专利保险制度。 Patent insurance was derived from the commercial general liability insurance in the1980s,and then became anindependent insurance,which also have been developed in Europe and Japan.For insured parties,patent insurance has the effectsof sharing litigation fees,alleviating the capital pressure and strengthening the negotiating ability.For the economic developmentof a country,patent insurance can encourage technology innovation,promote patent implementation,keep the balance ofindustrial structure,regulate market competition,and deepen the professional division of the labor.However,patent insurancecontains defects including difficult to popularize because of high price,difficult to predict and evaluate risks,complicated claimprocedure,and is likely to deduce moral risk.Combined with the pilots since late2011,China should establish a patent insurancesystem which is conducive to play its basic functions and make up for the main defects.
作者 李宗辉
出处 《电子知识产权》 CSSCI 2017年第8期48-55,共8页 Electronics Intellectual Property
基金 南京航空航天大学中央高校基本科研业务费项目(YAH17048)的成果
关键词 专利保险 专利侵权责任险 专利执行险 强制专利保险 道德风险 Patent insurance Patent infringement liability insurance Patent enforcement insurance Compulsory patent insurance Moral risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献67

  • 1李华.我国知识产权保险制度之构建[J].南京大学法律评论,2010(2):179-187. 被引量:4
  • 2陈展.企业专利诉讼策略的应用及防御[J].知识产权,2005,15(4):34-36. 被引量:13
  • 3孙宏涛.美国知识产权保险制度管窥[J].知识产权,2006,16(4):84-87. 被引量:10
  • 4Levin, R,C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.R., Winter, S.G., (1987).Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development. [J] Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 3, 242-279.
  • 5Mamfield, E., Schwartz, M. and Wagner, S. (1981) Imitation costs and patents: An empirical study. [J] Economic Journal, 91:907-918.
  • 6Rosemarie Ziedonis,Who's Suing Whom over What?Patent Litigation in the Semiconductor Industry, 1973-2001, STEP Board IP Meeting Washington, DC October 22, 2001.
  • 7Lanjouw J. O., Lemer J. (1998), The Enforcement of Intellectual Property R.ights:A Survey of the Empirical Literature, ANNALES D'E'CONOMIE ET DE STATISTIQUE. - N_ 49/50 - 1998.
  • 8Lanjouw, J. O. & Mark Schankerman (2001). Characteristics of Patent Litigation: A Window on Competition, The Rand Journal of Economics. Vol.32, no. 1, pp. 129-151.
  • 9Cremers, Katrin (2004). Determinants of Patent Litigation in Germany, wp.
  • 10Somaya, D., (2002). Patent Litigation in the United States(1970-2000), Robert H. smith School of Business ,University of Maryland, working paper.

共引文献45

同被引文献63

引证文献5

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部