期刊文献+

鞭打试验中BioRID Ⅱ与THUMS模型颈部损伤对比 被引量:4

Neck injury comparison between BioRID Ⅱ and THUMS model in whiplash test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为设计出可保护乘员颈部安全的座椅,在鞭打试验中,对BioRID Ⅱ和THUMS两种不同乘员模型,研究了颈部损伤情况。根据2015版中国新车评价规程(C-NCAP)中鞭打试验评价规程和评分原则,建立了座椅鞭打试验有限元仿真模型;对这两种模型动态响应和人体颈部损伤状态。结果表明:THUMS模型有较高的生物仿真度,其颈部伤害指数(NIC)、颈部剪切力、颈部扭矩以及上颈部拉力均大于BioRID Ⅱ模型。该结果可为提高和完善BioRID Ⅱ模型的生物仿真度提供参考。 Neck-injuries were investigated in whiplash test by two different occupant models(the THUMS(total human model for safety)and BioRID II model)to design a better anti-whiplash seat with occupant-neck protection.A seat finite element model was established to simulate whiplash test according to the China New Car Assessment Programme(C-NCAP)(2015Ed)evaluation procedures and principles of whiplash test score.The dynamic responses and neck-injuries were compared for the two models.The results show that the THUMS model has better biofidelity with larger neck injury index(NIC),neck shear force,and the torque and tension on neck than the BioRID II model.These will provide valuable references to improve biological fidelity of the BioRID II model.
作者 胡远志 胡源源 蒋成约 刘西 廖高健 HU Yuanzhi;HU Yuanyuan;JIANG Chengyue;LIU Xi;LIAO Gaojian(State Key Laboratory of Vehicle NVH (Noise, Vibration, Harshness) and Safety Technology, China Automotive Engineering Research Institute Co., Ltd. and Chongqing Changan Automobile Company Co., Ltd, Chongqing 401122, China;Key Laboratory of Advanced Manufacture Technology for Automobile Parts, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing 400054, China)
出处 《汽车安全与节能学报》 CAS CSCD 2017年第3期239-245,共7页 Journal of Automotive Safety and Energy
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51405050) 重庆市基础与前沿研究计划项目资助(cstc2015jcyj A00048) 2015年年重庆市高等教育教学改革研究项目资助(152032) 重庆市科技人才培养计划项目资助(cstc2013kjrcqnrc60002) 汽车零部件先进制造技术教育部重点实验室开放课题资助项目(2012KLMT08)
关键词 汽车安全 颈部损伤 鞭打试验 BioRID II模型 THUMS模型 中国新车评价规程(C-NCAP) vehicle safety neck injury whiplash test BioRID II model THUMS (total human model for safety) model China New Car Assessment Programme (C-NCAP)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献10

共引文献10

同被引文献17

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部