摘要
单位向发明人支付职务发明奖酬应当遵循合理性原则,从而实现两者之间利益的平衡。法院在适用该原则时,可以对当事人之间约定的奖酬进行事后审查,或者在没有约定及约定不合理时予以事前认定。事后审查偏重于程序性规制,而事前认定则偏重于实体性要求。我国应当借鉴日本经验,在《专利法》第四次修改时进一步明确"合理利益"要求。为完善对当事人约定奖酬的审查,要改进合理性原则的立法体例、充分尊重当事人约定奖酬的意思自治、明确约定奖酬合理性审查的程序性标准。为提升合理奖酬的司法裁定质量,不应将法定标准作为合理奖酬标准以及过度提高法定奖酬比例,应当明确认定合理奖酬数额的影响因素。由此,可以保障单位与发明人双方围绕职务发明所享有的合理利益。
Employee invention unit should pay remuneration for the inventor in accordance with the principle ofreasonableness,thus achieving the balance between both interests.When applying the rules,the court can use posteriorreview over the reward of the contract between the parties,and prior cognizance when there is no contract or thecontract being unreasonable.The posterior review emphasizes procedural regulation,while the prior cognizance stressessubstantive requirements.China should learn from the experience of Japan,and further clarify the requirements of“legitimate interests”in the fourth amendment of“patent law.”For the review mechanism on consideration partiesagreed to pay,the legislative style of rationality principle should be improved,respect the contract between parties,andclarify the procedure criteria to review its reasonableness.The rules of judicial recognition of the reasonable rewardshould not deem the legal award as reasonable,and determine the factors affecting the reasonable reward rather thanover-increasing the proportion of legal award,.Thus,we can protect the legitimate interests of both the unit and theinventor about the invention of the service.
作者
刘强
徐芃
LIU Qiang;XU Peng(School of Law, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
出处
《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》
CSSCI
2017年第5期59-66,共8页
Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences
基金
中国法学会部级法学研究项目"职务发明奖酬法律问题研究"(CLS(2016)D132)
中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(30916014111)
关键词
职务发明
奖酬
合理性原则
事后审查
事前认定
employee invention
rewards and remuneration
the principle of reasonableness
ex-post review
ex-ante cognizance
