摘要
P2P网络借贷的性质认定直接决定了监管体制和具体的监管措施。虽然在美国等国家,P2P网络借贷被定义为证券发行等金融业务,但在中国,P2P网络借贷却被定义为个人对个人的直接借贷,属于民间借贷范畴,不被认可为正规的金融业务。然而,经过创新改造之后的中国大多数P2P网络借贷业务,仅仅在形式上与直接借贷和民间借贷相类似,但在实质上与传统的民间借贷已经存在非常大的区别。将P2P网络借贷归类为民间借贷,使得监管体制和监管逻辑存在很多悖论和相互矛盾的地方,值得反思。
Cognizance of the nature of P2P lending directly determines its regulatory system and specificregulatory measures.Although in the United States and other countries,P2P lending is defined as securities issuance,but in China,P2P lending is defined as informal private lending,not recognized as formal financial services.However,after a series of innovation,Chinese-style P2P lending is significantly different to the traditional informal privatelending.Classifying P2P lending as informal private lending causes many paradoxes and contradictions in theregulatory system and logic,it's worth reflecting.
作者
郭峰
Guo Feng(School of Public Economics and Management, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics)
出处
《当代金融研究》
2017年第3期1-12,共12页
Journal of Contemporary Financial Research
基金
国家社会科学基金青年项目(批准号:16CJY065)
北京大学数字金融研究中心内部课题的资助
