期刊文献+

Bland-Altman法分析甲颏距离的测量的准确性 被引量:3

Applying Bland-Altman method to analyzing the consistency of thyromental distance measurement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:观察甲颏距离(TMD)测量的准确性及男女患者之间的区别,为临床应用提供参考。方法:由具有5年以上经验的麻醉医师通过手指触摸定位的常规方法测量TMD;由另一位麻醉医师采用超声技术定位甲状软骨切迹,并测量。采用Bland-Altman法进行分析,分别计算男性患者和女性患者触摸定位法测量TMD和超声定位测量TMD的一致性系数(Cronbach α)。结果:男性患者的一致性界限(LoA)为-7.4~6.1 mm,女性患者的LoA为-22.6~14.7 mm。男性患者的Cronbach α为0.958,女性患者的Cronbach α为0.438。结论:相对于男性患者,女性触诊法测量TMD的方法其准确性不高。 Objective:To assess the consistency of thyromental distance(TMD)measurement by Bland Altman method for clinical evidence in predicting difficult airway.Methods:A total of30male and30female patients were recruited,and undergone initial surface location via palpation with conventional TMD measurement by anesthesiologists with more than5year clinical experience.Then TMD was measured via ultrasound location by anesthesiologists skillful in ultrasound technology.Bland Altman method was then used to analyze the measurement consistency(Cronbach alpha coefficients)in males and females between two approaches.Results:The consistency limit(LoA)in male and female patients was between-7.4mm and-6.1mm,-22.6mm and-14.7mm respectively.The Cronbach alpha coefficient was0.958for males and0.438for females.Conclusion:TMD measurement by palpation location appears less accurate in female patients than male counterparts.
作者 王斌 金孝岠 陈永权 姚卫东 WANG Bin;JIN Xiaoju;CHEN Yongquan;YAO Weidong(Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College, Wuhu 241001, China)
出处 《皖南医学院学报》 CAS 2017年第6期586-588,共3页 Journal of Wannan Medical College
基金 皖南医学院中青年科研基金项目(WK2014F03) 安徽省教育厅自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2015A149)
关键词 TMD 性别 超声 Bland-Altman Cronbach-α thyromental distance gender ultrasound Bland Altman method Cronbach alpha coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献36

  • 1杜金满,郭建荣,任利远.罗库溴铵、维库溴铵和阿曲库铵用于全麻气管插管肌松效应的对比研究[J].实用药物与临床,2006,9(4):222-224. 被引量:19
  • 2易杰,罗爱伦,黄宇光.Bonfils纤维喉镜用于困难气道病人插管的效果[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2007,27(2):123-125. 被引量:5
  • 3Cook TM,Mac Dougall-Davis SR.Complications and failure of airway management[J].Br J Anaesth,2012,109 Suppl 1:i68-i85.
  • 4Tremblay MH,Williams S,Robitaille A,et al.Poor visualization during direct laryngoscopy and high upper lip bite test score are predictors of difficult intubation with the Glide Scope videolaryngoscope[J].Anesth Analg,2008,106:1495-1500.
  • 5Lundstrom LH,Vester-Andersen M,Moller AM,et al.Poor prognostic value of the modified Mallampati score:a meta-analysis involving 177 088 patients[J].Br J Anaesth,2011,107:659-667.
  • 6Peterson GN,Domino KB,Caplan RA,et al.Management of the difficult airway:a closed claims analysis[J].Anesthesiology,2005,103:33-39.
  • 7Khan ZH,Mohammadi M,Rasouli MR,et al.The diagnostic value of the upper lip bite test combined with sternomental distance,thyromental distance,and interincisor distance for prediction of easy laryngoscopy and intubation:a prospective study[J].Anesth Analg,2009,109:822-824.
  • 8Prakash S,Kumar A,Bhandari S,et al.Difficult laryngoscopy and intubation in the Indian population:An assessment of anatomical and clinical risk factors[J].Indian J Anaesth,2013,57:569-575.
  • 9Reed MJ,Dunn MJ,Mc Keown DW.Can an airway assessment score predict difficulty at intubation in the emergency department[J].Emerg Med J,2005,22:99-102.
  • 10Sullivan P.Anaesthesia for Medical Students[M].Cananda:the Department of Anaesthesia,Ottawa Civic Hospital,1999:35.

共引文献18

同被引文献2

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部