摘要
国际奥委会的"大阪规则"构成对兴奋剂违规运动员的双重处罚,违反"一事不再罚"原则,与比例原则不符,还违反《世界反兴奋剂条例》禁止对禁赛措施做出实质性变动的规定。罔顾对运动员基本人权的保护,单向度地严厉打击兴奋剂违规行为,背离了《世界反兴奋剂条例》的宗旨,"大阪规则"不应重启。认为:国家体育总局制定的部分部门规章与规范性文件中亦包含类似"大阪规则"的条文,这种规定与《世界反兴奋剂条例》的基本原则相冲突,违反中国加入《反对在体育运动中使用兴奋剂的国际公约》时所做的承诺,建议修改。
The Osaka Rule constitutes a duplicate punishment to the doping athletes so it violates the principle of ne bis in idem,contrary to the principle of proportionality,and against the compulsory clause in the World Anti-Doping Code(WADC)which prohibits substantive changes to the sanction measures stipulated in the WADC.Ignoring the protection of fundamental human rights of the athletes and unilaterally severely striking the doping offenses will violate the purpose of the WADC.The Osaka Rule shall not be reintroduced.There are some clauses in the Regulations formulated by the Chinese Sports General Administration similar to the Osaka Rules.These clauses are not only in conflict with the general principles of the WADC but also against the promise of Chinese Government in joining the International Convention against Doping in Sports 2005,therefore they should be amended.
作者
郭树理
GUO Shuli(Kenneth Wang Law School,Soochow University,Suzhou 215006,Jiangsu,China;Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Rule of Law Development of Universities and Colleges in Jiangsu Province,Nanjing 210023,Jiangsu,China)
出处
《上海体育学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第2期9-17,共9页
Journal of Shanghai University of Sport
基金
国家社会科学基金资助项目(17BTY007)
关键词
“大阪规则”
国际奥委会
反兴奋剂
禁赛
“一事不再罚”
"the Osaka Rule"
International Olympic Committee(IOC)
anti-doping
suspension
ne bis in idem
