摘要
目的:评价分心木联合前列腺动脉栓塞术治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的可行性和有效性。方法:选取2012年1月—2016年11月我科收治的确诊BPH患者10例,采用前列腺动脉栓塞术栓塞前列腺动脉,术后当日起,分心木2 g泡服,3次/d,连服7 d。比较术前和术后1个月、术后6个月的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、最大尿流率(Qmax)和剩余尿(RU)的变化。结果:10例患者共完成16支前列腺动脉的栓塞,单侧栓塞4例,双侧栓塞6例。相对于术前,术后6个月的IPSS显著改善[(28.30±3.27)vs.(4.40±1.17),P<0.05],QOL显著改善[(5.10±1.52)vs.(1.00±0.47),P<0.05],Qmax显著改善[(7.05±2.72)vs.(15.08±1.45),P<0.05],RU显著减少[(120.00±70.18)vs.(17.50±7.55),P<0.05]。结论:分心木联合前列腺动脉栓塞治疗良性前列腺增生可行且有效。
Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Semen Juglandis combined with prostatic arterial embolization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia(BHP).Methods:From January 2012 to November 2006,10 patients with BPH were treated with arterial embolization.On the day after operation,the patients were administered with 2 g Semen Juglandis after being infused in hot water or decoction,3 times/d,for 7 d.The changes of international prostate symptom score(IPSS),quality of life score(QOL),maximum urinary flow rate(Qmax)and residual urine(RU)preoperative and postoperative 1 month were compared.Another comparison is made between preoperative and postoperative 6 months.Results:Ten patients underwent embolization of 16 prostate artery,4 cases of unilateral embolism and 6 cases of bilateral embolization.Compared with preoperative indexes,in postoperative 6 months,IPSS was significantly improved[(28.30±3.27)vs.(4.40±1.17),P<0.05],and QOL was significantly improved(5.10±1.52 vs.(1.00±0.47),P<0.05];Qmax was significantly improved[(7.05±2.72)vs.(15.08±1.45),P<0.05],and RU was significantly reduced[(120.00±70.18)vs.(17.50±7.55),P<0.05].Conclusions:Semen Juglandis combined with prostatic arterial embolization is feasible and effective for treating BHP.
作者
申虎
朱磊
潘小平
Shen Hu;Zhu Lei;Pan Xiaoping(The People's Hospital of Wuhai,Inner Mongolia,Wuhai 016000,China)
出处
《中华介入放射学电子杂志》
2018年第1期37-39,共3页
Chinese Journal of Interventional Radiology：electronic edition
关键词
良性前列腺增生
动脉栓塞术
分心木
介入放射学
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
Prostate embolization
Semen Juglandis
Interventional radiology
