摘要
目的对比不同采血措施在血常规检验中的应用效果。方法选择2016年8月~2017年8月期间于本院进行血常规检验的220健康体检人员作为研究对象,以随机数字表将其分为对照组(采用末梢血采血措施进行血常规检验)与研究组(采用静脉血采血措施进行血常规检验)各110例。评价两组不同采血措施的血常规检验结果与抽血过程的疼痛度。结果研究组红细胞计数、白细胞计数、平均红细胞红蛋白、红细胞压积、平均红细胞体积、血红蛋白、平均红细胞血红蛋白均高于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者抽血过程中的VAS疼痛评分对比差异无统计学意义。结论相较于末梢血采血措施,通过静脉采血方式进行血常规检验的准确性与稳定性更高,适于临床应用。
Objective To compare the effect of different blood sampling measures in the blood routine test.Methods From August 2016 to August 2017 in our hospital during the routine inspection of the 220 health examination personnel as the research object,which were randomly divided into control group(using peripheral blood sampling measures for blood test)and study group(using venous blood sample measures for blood test),110 cases in each group.The results of blood routine test and the pain of the blood in the two groups were evaluated.Results The Red blood cell count,white blood cell count,mean red blood cell red blood cell,hematocrit,mean red blood cell volume,hemoglobin,mean red blood cell hemoglobin in the study group were all higher than those in the control group(P<0.05).There was no significant difference in VAS pain score in the two groups.Conclusion Compared with the blood sampling measures,the accuracy and stability of blood routine examination through venous blood sampling is higher,which is suitable for clinical application.
作者
傅桂霞
张超
Fu Guixia;Zhang Chao(Ninth People's Hospital of Qingdao City,Qingdao,Shandong,266002,China)
出处
《当代医学》
2018年第12期78-79,共2页
Contemporary Medicine
关键词
末梢血
静脉血
血常规检验
Peripheral blood
Venous blood
Blood routine test
