期刊文献+

一期与分期输尿管软镜碎石术治疗上尿路结石疗效分析 被引量:6

Analysis of efficacy of one-stage and staged flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy in treating upper urinary tract calculi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨一期与分期输尿管软镜碎石术(FURL)治疗上尿路结石的临床疗效。方法回顾性分析2016年1月至2017年3月该院收治的105例行FURL患者的临床资料,其中一期组47例,除2例因输尿管狭窄置鞘困难和1例结石梗阻以上尿液明显浑浊而留置双J管二期手术外,其余44例患者均成功碎石;分期组58例,均成功碎石。比较两组成功碎石患者手术时间、置鞘成功率、结石清除率、并发症发生率、总住院时间的差异。结果两组患者手术时间、置鞘成功率、结石清除率、并发症发生率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。一期组患者总住院时间[(5.39±1.50)d]明显短于分期组[(6.60±1.38)d],差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在严格把握手术适应证的条件下,一期和分期FURL在有效性和安全性方面相当,但一期FURL治疗周期和住院时间更短、治疗费用更低,可在临床开展应用。 Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of one-stage and staged flexible ureteroscope lithotripsy(FURL)in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi.Methods The clinical data of 105 patients underwent FURL in this hospital from January 2016 to March 2017 were retrospectively analyzed,including 47 cases of one-stage group,excepting 2 cases adopted double-J tube indwelling because of difficult sheath placing due to ureterostenosis and 1 case of obvious urine cloudy,other 44 cases were succeeded in lithotripsy;and 58 cases of staged group all succeeded in lithotripsy.Then the operation time,placing sheath success rate,stone clearance rate,complication occurrence rate,total hospitalization time were compared between the two groups.Results The operation time,placing sheath success rate,stone clearance rate and complication occu-rrence rate had no statistical difference between the two groups(P>0.05).The total hospitalization time in the one-stage group was(5.39±1.50)d,which was significantly shorter than(6.60±1.38)d in the staged group,the difference was statistically signifi-cant(P<0.05).Conclusion Under the condition of strictly grasping the indications of operation,the one-stage FURL is comparable to the staged FURL in terms of efficacy and safety,moreover has a shorter treatment period,shorter hospital stay and lower cost,which can be carried and applied in clinic.
作者 刘涛 于圣杰 曾进 姜庆 LIU Tao;YU Shengjie;ZENG Jin;JIANG Qing(Department of Urological Surgery,Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400010,China)
出处 《现代医药卫生》 2018年第8期1128-1130,共3页 Journal of Modern Medicine & Health
基金 重庆市科技惠民计划项目(cstc2016kjhmpt1001-5)
关键词 输尿管镜检查 碎石术 激光/方法 钬/治疗应用 尿路结石/外科学 导管 留置 引流术 治疗结果 Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy,laser/methods Holmium/therapeutic use Urinary calculi/surgery Cath-eters,indwelling Drainage Treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献83

  • 1张慕淳,孔祥波,张刚,郑泽霖.输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石术治疗复杂上尿路结石[J].中国内镜杂志,2008,14(8):810-811. 被引量:23
  • 2程跃,刘冠琳.输尿管软镜治疗鹿角形结石的发展与展望[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2013,2(3):163-165. 被引量:23
  • 3叶章群,邓耀良,董诚.泌尿系结石[M].第2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:100-102.
  • 4MAURICE S, LUTZ T, JENS R, et al. Complications in percu- taneousnephrolithotomy [J]. Europ Urol,2007, 51 (4): 899- 906.
  • 5HUSSAIN M, ACHER P, PENEV B, et al. Redefining the lim- its of flexible ureterorenoscopy [J]. J Endourol, 2011, 25 (1) : 45-49.
  • 6MARCELLO C, JOSE R, COLOMBO JR, et ai. Outcomes offlexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with holmium laser for upper u- rinary tract calculi [J]. Int Braz J Urol, 2008, 34(2) : 143-149.
  • 7SAUSSINE C. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy[J]. Prog Urol,2013,23(14) : 1168-1171.
  • 8GHONEIM IA, EL-GHONEIMY MN, EL-NAGGAR AE, et al. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in impacted upper ure- teral stones: a prospective randomized comparison between stented and non-stented techniques[J]. Urology, 2010,75 (1) : 45-50.
  • 9HANDA RK, MCATEER JA, CONNORS BA, et al. Optimis- ing an escalating shockwave amplitude treatment strategy to pro- tect the kidney from injury during shockwave lithotripsy[J]. BJU Int,2012, 110(11) :1041-1047.
  • 10MISHRA S, SHARMA R, GARG C, et al. Prospective corn parative study of miniperc and standard PNL for treatment of 1 to2 cmsize renal stone[J]. BJUInt,2011,108(6): 896 899.

共引文献216

同被引文献62

引证文献6

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部