摘要
在严格责任犯罪中,行为人对行为的一个或多个要素缺乏犯意时亦成立犯罪。该类犯罪的存在与美国普通法中报应主义和功利主义观念并不完全契合,它虽然可以提高司法效率但也可能损害司法公正,还可能违反联邦宪法的规定,因此该类犯罪在美国刑法学者中颇具争议。为解决严格责任犯罪引发的各种问题,许多学者对严格责任犯罪立法提出了替代、限制或改造的方案。这些方案对于我们正确对待严格责任犯罪具有启示意义。
In strictliability crime,the actor is guilty of crime even when mens rea is lacking in one or more criminal elements.There is an inconsistency between strictliability crime and theories of punishment(utilitarianism and retributivism).Although strictliability crime could improve judicial efficiency,it may do harm to judicial fairness.Furthermore,it may also contravene the US Constitution.Therefore strictliability crime is a controversial issue among criminal scholars and judges.To resolve the controversy caused by strictliability crime,scholars put forward some suggestions to replace,limit or reform it in legislation.Their solutions are instructive for China in dealing with strictliability crime in the criminal law.
出处
《环球法律评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第3期127-136,共10页
Global Law Review
基金
司法部国家法治与法学理论研究项目"行政法与刑法衔接问题研究"(13SFB3012)的研究成果
