期刊文献+

澳大利亚“印太”战略观:内涵、动因和前景 被引量:24

Australian Views of the “Indo-Pacific”:Implications, Drivers and Prospects
原文传递
导出
摘要 澳大利亚是"印太"概念的主要倡议者,是较早将"印太"地区正式纳入官方安全利益关切的国家。将澳大利亚与印度或印度洋联结是澳大利亚"印太"战略观一以贯之的主线。中印的共同崛起、美国"重返亚洲"以及"中等强国"抱负是澳大利亚重视"印太"地区的地缘政治因素。印度经济的崛起、印度洋重要性上升及其衍生出的北澳大开发需要是澳大利亚直接关注"印太"地区的地缘经济因素。此外,相对于"亚太"而言,"印太"的叙述框架更有利于澳大利亚缓解身份认同焦虑。文章指出,澳大利亚内部对"印太"的战略内涵及其重要性的认知并不完全一致:"亚太第一派"基本否定"印太"作为澳大利亚新的战略地理空间;"印太最小主义派"强调利用印度制衡中国,维护"印太"均势;"印太最大主义派"强调中美日印的大国协调和共治;"印太功能主义派"强调减少能源和海洋安全联结产生的战略对抗,追求"印太海洋共治"。目前特恩布尔政府的"印太"战略思路倾向于"印太最小主义派"。探讨澳大利亚"印太"战略观的演变有助于中方更好地理解澳大利亚的利益诉求和战略走向,更加准确地把握和调整"印太"时代的中澳关系。 Australia is a key advocate of the idea of an“IndoPacific”region,and one of the first countries to make the concept a key part of its overall strategic postureUnderlying the historical evolution of the IndoPacific construct is the goal of connecting Australia with India and the Indian OceanThe importance of geopolitics and geoeconomics,highlighted by the rise of China and India and the US“pivot to Asia”,has figured into Australia’s recent rediscovery of the“IndoPacific”as a maritime regional frameworkIdentity politics also matterThe narrative of the IndoPacific,as opposed to the AsiaPacific,may help resolve the tensions between Australia’s“Western”traditions and its physical location in AsiaThis paper will analyze and review different schools of thought that have emerged to explain the IndoPacific concept’s significanceThe Turnbull government,by and large,aligns with the“IndoPacific Minimalists”,who highlight the strategic weight of India as a possible way to“balance”ChinaOverall,it is vital that the policymaking and scholarly communities in China understand what this new conception of the region means for Australia’s perception of its national interests,its strategic orientation,and its possible implications for China.
作者 许少民 Xu Shaomin
出处 《当代亚太》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第3期115-156,159,160,共43页 Journal of Contemporary Asia-Pacific Studies
关键词 “印太” 大国均势 大国协调 海洋共治 “四方安全对话” IndoPacific GreatPower Balancing Concert of Powers Maritime Condominium Quadrilateral Security Dialogue(Quad)
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献51

  • 1G.冈萨雷斯,汤小■.何谓“中等强国”?[J].国外社会科学,1986(6):43-44. 被引量:17
  • 2[美]尼古拉斯·斯皮克曼.《和平地理学》,商务印书馆1965年版,第71页.
  • 3Yogesh Josh i.'The Bandwagoning-Balancing Game:Contra-dictions of the India-US Partnership'. http://www.idsa.in/idsacomments/TheBandwagoningBalancingGame Contradic-tionsoftheIndiaUSPartnership_yjoshi_050811 . 2011
  • 4Hillary Clinton.'America’’s Asia Century,Foreign Policy,'. http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/10/11/americas_pacific_century?page=0,6 . 2011
  • 5."India Must Play Significant Role in Asia Pacific:US,"[].Rediff News.2011
  • 6Manjeet S.Pardesi."India,US In East Asia:Emerging Strategic Partnership-Analysis,"[].Euraisa Review.2011
  • 7Rory Medcalf,“The Indo-Pacific:What’s in a Name,”The American National Interest,Vol.9,No.2,2013,http://www.the-american-interest.com/2013/10/10/the-indo-pacific-whats-in-a-name/.
  • 8外交部网站:http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/mfa_chn/gjhdq_603914/gj_603916/dyz_608952/1206_608954/.
  • 9Jim Thomas,Zack Cooper,and Iskander Rehman,“Gateway to the Indo-pacific:Australian Defense Strategy and the Future of the Australian-U.S.Alliance,”Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments,Washington,DC,2013,p.1.
  • 10[美]道格拉斯·麦克阿瑟.《麦克阿瑟回忆录》,上海译文出版社,1984年版,第48页.

共引文献41

同被引文献320

引证文献24

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部